ArticleGenome research2023
Comparing genomic and epigenomic features across species using the WashU Comparative Epigenome Browser.
Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- HPRC2: A human pangenome reference with near-complete coverage of common genetic variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Quantifying reference alignment bias in functional genomics analyses.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Characterizing cytosine methylation of polymorphic transposable element insertions using the human pangenome resources.Genome research · 2026Article
- Benchmarking genome choice in functional genomics analyses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Beta cell-derived cholecystokinin drives obesity-associated pancreatic adenocarcinoma development.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic landscape of transposable elements revealsGenome research · 2026Article
- An Integrated Single-Cell and Epigenomic Resource for Comparative Analysis of the Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- WashU Epigenome Browser update 2025.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- methylGrapher: genome-graph-based processing of DNA methylation data from whole genome bisulfite sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Cis-regulatory evolution of the recently expanded Ly49 gene family.Nature communications · 2024Article
- mHapBrowser: a comprehensive database for visualization and analysis of DNA methylation haplotypes.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome browsers have become an intuitive and critical tool to visualize and analyze genomic features and data. Conventional genome browsers display data/annotations on a single reference genome/assembly; there are also genomic alignment viewer/browsers that help users visualize alignment, mismatch, and rearrangement between syntenic regions. However, there is a growing need for a comparative epigenome browser that can display genomic and epigenomic data sets across different species and enable users to compare them between syntenic regions. Here, we present the WashU Comparative Epigenome Browser. It allows users to load functional genomic data sets/annotations mapped to different genomes and display them over syntenic regions simultaneously. The browser also displays genetic differences between the genomes from single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) to structural variants (SVs) to visualize the association between epigenomic differences and genetic differences. Instead of anchoring all data sets to the reference genome coordinates, it creates independent coordinates of different genome assemblies to faithfully present features and data mapped to different genomes. It uses a simple, intuitive genome-align track to illustrate the syntenic relationship between different species. It extends the widely used WashU Epigenome Browser infrastructure and can be expanded to support multiple species. This new browser function will greatly facilitate comparative genomic/epigenomic research, as well as support the recent growing needs to directly compare and benchmark the T2T CHM13 assembly and other human genome assemblies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.