ArticleeNeuro2023
Subregional Differences in Medium Spiny Neuron Intrinsic Excitability Properties between Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell in Male Rats.
Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Connectome Analysis of the Nucleus Accumbens: Refining Radiosurgical Targeting for Addictive Disorders.Cureus · 2025Article
- Neuron soma size and density measurements in rat striatal regions disaggregated by sex and estrous cycle phase.Brain structure & function · 2025Article
- Nucleus Accumbens: A Therapeutic Target for Radiomodulation for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Impacts of Adolescent Cannabinoid Exposure on Striatal Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Pathophysiology Are Prevented by the AntioxidantBiological psychiatry global open science · 2024Article
- Regional heterogeneity in the membrane properties of mouse striatal neurons.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is known for its central role in reward and motivation (Day and Carelli, 2007; Floresco, 2015; Salgado and Kaplitt, 2015). Decades of research on the cellular arrangement, density, and connectivity of the NAc have identified two main subregions known as the core and shell (Záborszky et al., 1985; Berendse and Groenewegen, 1990; Zahm and Heimer, 1990). Although anatomically and functionally different, both the NAc core and shell are mainly comprised of GABAergic projection neurons known as medium spiny neurons (MSNs) (Matamales et al., 2009). Several studies have identified key morphologic differences between core and shell MSNs (Meredith et al., 1992; Forlano and Woolley, 2010) but few studies have directly addressed how core and shell MSNs differ in their intrinsic excitability (Pennartz et al., 1992; O'Donnell and Grace, 1993). Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in slices prepared from naive and rewarded male rats, we found that MSNs in the NAc shell were significantly more excitable than MSNs in the NAc core in both groups. In the shell, MSNs had significantly greater input resistance, lower cell capacitance, and a greater sag. This was accompanied by a lower action potential current threshold, a greater number of action potentials, and faster firing frequency compared with core MSNs. These subregional differences in intrinsic excitability could provide a potential physiological link to the distinct anatomic characteristics of core and shell MSNs and to their distinct functional roles in reward learning (Zahm, 1999; Ito and Hayen, 2011; Saddoris et al., 2015; West and Carelli, 2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.