Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37156593›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Jiao Wang, Ran Li, Junke Chang, Yan Wang, Yutian Lai, Yingxian Dong, Guowei Che

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Construction of a postoperative home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program protocol for lung cancer patients delivered using the internet: A Delphi-based study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Chinese Expert Consensus on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer (2024 Edition)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ran LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2794-9948
Junke ChangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yutian LaiLung Cancer Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yingxian DongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Guowei CheDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China cheguowei_hx@aliyun.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-6180
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer remains a highly fatal disease. Surgical resection has been proven to be the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. The conventional hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is shown to reduce symptoms, improve exercise capacity and impact the quality of life (QoL) for lung cancer patients. To date, scientific evidence on the effectiveness of home-based PR for patients with lung cancer following surgery is scarce. We aim to explore if home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from West China Hospital, Sichuan University and randomly allocated to either an outpatient group or a home-based group at a ratio of 1:1. The PR programme involves self-management and exercises. The exercise includes warm-up (10 min), aerobic training (20 min), resistance training (15 min) and cool-down (10 min), lasting 4 weeks, with two sessions per week either at home or in the outpatient setting. The intensity will be adjusted according to the modified Borg rating of perceived exertion and heart rate before and after each exercise session. The primary outcome is QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 & LC 13 after an intervention. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness measured by a 6 min walk test and stair-climbing test and symptom severity measured by patient-reported questionnaires and pulmonary function. The main hypothesis is that home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of West China Hospital and is also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100053714.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsQuality of LifeExercise TherapyHumansOutpatientsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodRehabilitation medicineRespiratory tract tumoursTHORACIC MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37156593
PMCPMC10174035
OpenAlexW4375956233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.