ArticleBMJ open2023
'Real-life' benefit of hearing preservation cochlear implantation in the paediatric population: a single-site case-control study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Proteomic Landscape of Cochlear Implant Trauma: An iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Analysis Utilizing an Ex Vivo Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Minimally invasive cochlear implantation: advances and future directions].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCochlear implantation with hearing preservation (HPCI) has allowed a cochlear implant (CI) electrode to be implanted while trying to preserve residual acoustic low-frequency hearing. The concept arises from the importance of this low-frequency information and the limitations of a CI in several auditory domains. The combination of electrical hearing with either preserved acoustic hearing or amplified 'natural' hearing has the potential to address these issues and enable children with HPCI to closely follow normal auditory development.The aim of this study is to evaluate the 'real-life' benefit of preserved acoustic low-frequency hearing in children with a CI, understand the benefits of preserved natural hearing in complex listening situations and so enable parents and children to make an informed choice about implantation. Ultimately, helping to ensure the maximum number of children benefit from this life-changing intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nineteen ears in children and young people aged 6-17 years old with 'successful' HPCI will be subjected to a test battery consisting of: (1) spatial release from masking; (2) complex pitch direction discrimination; (3) melodic identification; (4) perception of prosodic features in speech and (5) threshold equalising noise test. Subjects will be tested in the electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS)/electro-natural stimulation (ENS) and the electric-only (ES) condition, thereby acting as their own control group. Standard demographic and hearing health information will be collected. In the absence of comparable published data to power the study, sample size was determined on pragmatic grounds. Tests are exploratory and for hypothesis-generating purposes. Therefore, the standard criterion of p<0.05 will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Health Research Authority and NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) within the UK (22/EM/0017). Industry funding was secured via a competitive researcher-led grant application process. Trial results will be subject to publication according to the definition of the outcome presented in this protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.