Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37156553›Full record

GuidelineCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2023

Recommendations on screening for primary prevention of fragility fractures.

Guylène Thériault, Heather Limburg, Scott Klarenbach, Donna L Reynolds, John J Riva, Brett D Thombs, Laure A Tessier, Roland Grad, Brenda J Wilson, Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

Open access · goldAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations on interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  2. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Clinical practice guideline for management of osteoporosis and fracture prevention in Canada: 2023 update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Implementing a structured osteoporosis management workflow in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  7. Claims-based frailty index and risk of hospitalisation for hip fracture among adults aged 60-74 years in Tokyo, Japan.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  8. Approach to osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk management in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Vitamin D and fracture prevention.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Osteoporosis Canada guideline on screening for men likely low value.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guylène ThériaultDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Heather LimburgDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Scott KlarenbachDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Donna L ReynoldsDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
John J RivaDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Brett D ThombsDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Laure A TessierDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Roland GradDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Brenda J WilsonDepartments of Family Medicine (Theriault, Grad) and Psychiatry (Thombs), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Limburg, Tessier), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Klarenbach), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Reynolds), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Wilson), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFragility fractures are a major health concern for older adults and can result in disability, admission to hospital and long-term care, and reduced quality of life. This Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (task force) guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on screening to prevent fragility fractures in community-dwelling individuals aged 40 years and older who are not currently on preventive pharmacotherapy.

methodsWe commissioned systematic reviews on benefits and harms of screening, predictive accuracy of risk assessment tools, patient acceptability and benefits of treatment. We analyzed treatment harms via a rapid overview of reviews. We further examined patient values and preferences via focus groups and engaged stakeholders at key points throughout the project. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to determine the certainty of evidence for each outcome and strength of recommendations, and adhered to Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE), Guidelines International Network and Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP-2) reporting guidance. RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend "risk assessment-first" screening for prevention of fragility fractures in females aged 65 years and older, with initial application of the Canadian clinical Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD). The FRAX result should be used to facilitate shared decision-making about the possible benefits and harms of preventive pharmacotherapy. After this discussion, if preventive pharmacotherapy is being considered, clinicians should request BMD measurement using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the femoral neck, and re-estimate fracture risk by adding the BMD T-score into FRAX (conditional recommendation, low-certainty evidence). We recommend against screening females aged 40-64 years and males aged 40 years and older (strong recommendation, very low-certainty evidence). These recommendations apply to community-dwelling individuals who are not currently on pharmacotherapy to prevent fragility fractures.

interpretationRisk assessment-first screening for females aged 65 years and older facilitates shared decision-making and allows patients to consider preventive pharmacotherapy within their individual risk context (before BMD). Recommendations against screening males and younger females emphasize the importance of good clinical practice, where clinicians are alert to changes in health that may indicate the patient has experienced or is at higher risk of fragility fracture.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedBone DensityCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionQuality of LifeRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37156553
PMCPMC10166624
OpenAlexW4375954592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.