Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37155868›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Mapping human brain charts cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

Maria A Di Biase, Ye Ella Tian, Richard A I Bethlehem, Jakob Seidlitz, Aaron F Alexander-Bloch, B T Thomas Yeo, Andrew Zalesky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Charting Cervical Spinal Cord Morphometry Across the Lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spatially and temporally progressive hypoperfusion in Alzheimer's disease revealed by normative modeling.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria A Di BiaseMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7100-651X
Ye Ella TianMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3107-5550
Richard A I BethlehemDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0714-0685
Jakob SeidlitzDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Children's Hospital of, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Aaron F Alexander-BlochDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Children's Hospital of, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-1893
B T Thomas YeoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore City 119077, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-3276
Andrew ZaleskyMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain scans acquired across large, age-diverse cohorts have facilitated recent progress in establishing normative brain aging charts. Here, we ask the critical question of whether cross-sectional estimates of age-related brain trajectories resemble those directly measured from longitudinal data. We show that age-related brain changes inferred from cross-sectionally mapped brain charts can substantially underestimate actual changes measured longitudinally. We further find that brain aging trajectories vary markedly between individuals and are difficult to predict with population-level age trends estimated cross-sectionally. Prediction errors relate modestly to neuroimaging confounds and lifestyle factors. Our findings provide explicit evidence for the importance of longitudinal measurements in ascertaining brain development and aging trajectories.

Indexed as

AgingBrainCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingbrain trajectorycross-sectionalindividual predictionlongitudinalnormative models

Identifiers

PMID37155868
PMCPMC10193972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.