ArticleJournal of perinatal medicine2023
The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery.
Article in Journal of perinatal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDuring obstetric hemorrhage, peripheral vasoconstriction maintains heart rate and blood pressure until compensatory mechanisms are overwhelmed and patients deteriorate rapidly. Real-time perfusion measurements could quantify vasoconstriction, improving early recognition of hemorrhage and facilitating early intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality. The AccuFlow device makes rapid, non-invasive, quantitative measurements of perfusion, but has not been studied for hemorrhage detection or used in surgical settings. This study evaluated feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the AccuFlow for assessment of blood loss at cesarean delivery (CD).
methodsIn this pilot study, sensors were applied to the wrist, forearm, bicep, and chest wall of 25 patients undergoing scheduled CD. Postoperatively, sensors were removed and patients rated the AccuFlow and the standard anesthesia monitoring equipment on a validated comfort rating scale for wearable computers (CRS). Blood loss was estimated by the surgical team (EBL) and calculated from change in hematocrit, weight, and height (CBL). CRS scores were compared via Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. Coefficients of correlation between sensor readings and CBL, and between EBL and CBL, were compared using Fisher's R-to-z transformation.
resultsThere were no safety events; no participants requested device removal. CRS ratings of the AccuFlow and the standard monitoring equipment were similar (7.2 vs. 8.8, p=0.25). Change in wrist perfusion from delivery to dressing placement was more strongly correlated with CBL than was EBL (R=-0.48 vs. R=0.087, p=0.03).
conclusionsThe AccuFlow sensor is well-tolerated and shows promise in detecting intrapartum hemorrhage, though larger studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.