Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37155665›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care in India: Results from 2019-2021 National Family Health Survey.

Nandan Thakkar, Prima Alam, Deepak Saxena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Discordance of 3rd and 4th generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold assays by pregnancy stages in India.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nandan ThakkarOffice of Graduate Education, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7237-4114
Prima AlamPublic Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8286-9866
Deepak SaxenaIndian Institute of Public Health-Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite progress in recent years, full antenatal care utilization in India continues to be relatively low and inequitable, particularly between states and districts. In 2015-2016, for example, only 51% of women aged 15-49 in India attended antenatal care at least four times during pregnancy. Using data from the fifth iteration of India's National Family Health Survey, our study aims to explore factors related to the underutilization of antenatal care in India. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from the most recent live birth in the past five years among women aged 15-49 years were included in our analysis (n = 172,702). Our outcome variable was "adequate antenatal care visits", defined as four or more antenatal visits. Utilizing Andersen's behavioral model, 14 factors were identified as possible explanatory variables. We used univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models to analyze the association between explanatory variables and adequate visits. Associations were considered statistically significant if p<0.05.

resultsOf the 172,702 women in our sample, 40.75% (95% CI: 40.31-41.18%) had an inadequate number of antenatal care visits. In multivariate analysis, women with less formal education, from poorer households and more rural areas had higher odds of inadequate visits. Regionally, women from Northeastern and Central states had higher odds of inadequate antenatal care utilization compared to those from Southern states. Caste, birth order, and pregnancy intention were also among the variables associated with utilization of antenatal care. DISCUSSION: Despite improvements in antenatal care utilization, there is cause for concern. Notably, the percentage of Indian women receiving adequate antenatal care visits is still below the global average. Our analysis also reveals a continuity in the groups of women at highest risk for inadequate visits, which may be due to structural drivers of inequality in healthcare access. To improve maternal health and access to antenatal care services, interventions aimed at poverty alleviation, infrastructure development, and education should be pursued.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPrenatal CareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysHumansIndiaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy, MultipleSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID37155665
PMCPMC10166529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.