ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023
A Single-Center Study Using IVUS to Guide Rotational Atherectomy for Chronic Renal Disease's Calcified Coronary Artery.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for heavily calcified coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Ultrasonic flow ratio measured immediately after successful rotational atherectomy with stent implantation predicts major adverse cardiovascular events.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Target vessel-specific efficacy and short-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy in the treatment of chronic total occlusion.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of an IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy (RA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic renal patients with complex coronary calcification who are at risk for contrast-related acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods: From October 2018 to October 2021, 48 patients with chronic renal disease who were receiving PCI with RA at the General Hospital of NingXia Medical University were informed for data collection for this research. They were randomly assigned to the IVUS-guided RA group and the Standard RA group, which did not use IVUS. According to a clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy in China, both PCI procedures were performed. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) results from the study group were used to describe the morphology of the lesion and to guide the selection of burrs, balloons, and stents. IVUS and angiography were used to evaluate the outcome in the end. IVUS-guided RA PCI and Standard RA PCI groups' effects and results were contrasted. Results: There were no appreciable differences in the clinical baseline characteristics between the IVUS-guided RA PCI group and the Standard RA PCI group. The average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of two groups was (81.42 ± 20.22 vs 82.34 ± 22.19) mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: In chronic renal patients with complex coronary calcification, an IVUS-guided RA PCI technique is effective and safe. It can also lower the volume of contrast and perhaps the incidence of contrast-related AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.