ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2023
Gut microbiota predicts the diagnosis of celiac disease in Saudi children.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Bacteria: The Emerging Role of the Gut Virome and Mycobiome in Celiac Disease.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Harnessing gut microbiome enzymes:Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Cocoa Supplementation Alleviates Gliadin-Induced Intestinal Dysbiosis in a Mouse Model of Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Uncovering stage-specific neural and molecular progression in Alzheimer's disease: Implications for early screening.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Complex Probiotics Ameliorate Fecal Microbiota Transplantation-Induced IBS in Mice via Gut Microbiota and Metabolite Modulation.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Variations in gut microbiota in celiac disease patients: a systematic review.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Review
- Coeliac disease and microbiota: is it time for personalised biotics intervention? A scoping review.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2025Article
- Celiac disease gut microbiome studies in the third millennium: reviewing the findings and gaps of available literature.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Review
- The Contribution of the Intestinal Microbiota to the Celiac Disease Pathogenesis along with the Effectiveness of Probiotic Therapy.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Advances in Understanding the Human Gut Microbiota and Its Implication in Pediatric Celiac Disease-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCeliac disease (CeD) is a multisystem immune-mediated multifactorial condition strongly associated with the intestinal microbiota.
aimTo evaluate the predictive power of the gut microbiota in the diagnosis of CeD and to search for important taxa that may help to distinguish CeD patients from controls.
methodsMicrobial DNA from bacteria, viruses, and fungi, was isolated from mucosal and fecal samples of 40 children with CeD and 39 controls. All samples were sequenced using the HiSeq platform, the data were analyzed, and abundance and diversities were assessed. For this analysis, the predictive power of the microbiota was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) using data for the entire microbiome. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the significance of the difference between AUCs. The Boruta logarithm, a wrapper built around the random forest classification algorithm, was used to identify important bacterial biomarkers for CeD.
resultsIn fecal samples, AUCs for bacterial, viral, and fungal microbiota were 52%, 58%, and 67.7% respectively, suggesting weak performance in predicting CeD. However, the combination of fecal bacteria and viruses showed a higher AUC of 81.8 %, indicating stronger predictive power in the diagnosis of CeD. In mucosal samples, AUCs for bacterial, viral, and fungal microbiota were 81.2%, 58.6%, and 35%, respectively, indicating that mucosal bacteria alone had the highest predictive power. Two bacteria,
conclusionThe excellent predictive power of the combination of the fecal bacterial and viral microbiota with mucosal bacteria alone indicates a potential role in the diagnosis of difficult cases of CeD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.