Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37155480›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2023

Administrative Databases and Diagnostic Therapeutic and Assistance Paths -PDTA- in the Monitoring Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Experience of ATS Pavia.

Giacomo M Bruno, Maria Chiara Valentino, Alessandra Brunetti, Sergio Di Matteo, Ivan Begovic, Edoardo Croce, Garifallia Sakellariou, Serena Bugatti, Pietro Perotti, Silvia Vecchio and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giacomo M BrunoDepartment of Drug Sciences, Center of Pharmaceuticals Economics and Medical Technologies Evaluation, CEFAT.Unipv - University of Pavia at Centro di Ricerca SAVE Studi, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4571-654X
Maria Chiara ValentinoS.A.V.E. Research Center - Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8736-3503
Alessandra BrunettiResearch and Innovation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-6991
Sergio Di MatteoS.A.V.E. Research Center - Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milano, Italy.
Ivan BegovicS.A.V.E. Research Center - Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milano, Italy.
Edoardo CroceScientific Direction - IRCCS istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Garifallia SakellariouDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Serena BugattiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Pietro PerottiU.O.C. Epidemiological Observatory - Health Protection Agency of Pavia (ATS Pavia), Pavia, Italy.
Silvia VecchioU.O.C. Epidemiological Observatory - Health Protection Agency of Pavia (ATS Pavia), Pavia, Italy.
Simona MigliazzaU.O.C. Epidemiological Observatory - Health Protection Agency of Pavia (ATS Pavia), Pavia, Italy.
Roberto LangellaSIFO Regional Secretariat - Società Italiana di Farmacia Ospedaliera e dei Servizi Farmaceutici delle Aziende Sanitarie, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6096-3007
Giorgio L ColomboDepartment of Drug Sciences, Center of Pharmaceuticals Economics and Medical Technologies Evaluation, CEFAT.Unipv - University of Pavia at Centro di Ricerca SAVE Studi, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5790-8891
University of Pavia · ITCentro Studi Industriali · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The current flows of the SSN represent the set of interest whose interconnection alone justifies the current study. These flows can be interconnected with other sources, institutional or otherwise, in order to answer well-defined questions. Objective: The objective of the study is to verify, through the analysis of administrative databases, any differences in the consumption of health resources between biological off-patent originator drugs and biosimilars in real clinical practice, with particular reference to the rheumatology area. Methods: Through the use of assisted databases (BDA) of ATS Pavia we evaluated the differences in terms of consumption of health resources related to the different drugs under analysis. Annual and daily costs were calculated by total patient cost, stratified for different treatments, considering the sum of total costs for the prescriptions of drugs subject to the analysis. Another objective was to evaluate the adherence of the drugs of interest, by utilizing specific indicators (MPR). Results: A total of 145 patients were analyzed. Among enrolled patients, 26.9% of users were treated with a biosimilar drug, while 73.1% with a biologic originator. Adherence is higher if it is considered the population treated with biosimilar drugs (82.1%). Total cost (including drug prescriptions, hospitalizations, outpatient services, tests for any cause) during the observation period of 1 year is 14,274.08. 87.7% of the total is attributable to drugs. Non-hospitalized patients are the least expensive, whether they were treated with biologics or biosimilars. Conclusion: In our sample, biosimilar drugs tend to be underused: the treatment of a patient with a chronic autoimmune disease is a clinical process that involves many health professionals, and a criticality could also derive from the difficult communication between the various professional figures who get involved with the whole patient treatment.

Indexed as

biosimilarEULAR recommendationsPDTAreal world datarheumatic diseasesrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID37155480
PMCPMC10122854
OpenAlexW4366339479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.