ArticleCureus2023
Racial Disparity in HCV Demographics and Treatment Between Interferon Era (2002-2003) and Direct Acting Anti-viral Era (2019).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment increased the sustained viral response (SVR) rate of patients with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and eliminated response disparities between African American (AA) and non-AA patients seen with interferon (IFN). The aim of this study was to compare 2019 HCV patients (DAA era) to patients from January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003 (IFN era) in our predominantly AA clinic population. Methods We extracted data on 585 HCV patients seen in 2019 (DAA era) and compared them to 402 patients seen in the IFN era. Results Most HCV patients were born between 1945 and 1965, but in the DAA era more younger patients were identified. Non-AA patients in both eras were less likely to be infected with genotype 1 compared to AA (95% vs 54%, P<0.001). Fibrosis was not increased in the DAA Era as compared to the IFN era as assessed either by serum-based assays (APRI, FIB-4) or transient elastography (FibroScan) (DAA era) vs biopsy (IFN era). More patients were treated in 2019 compared to 2002-2003 (159/585=27% vs 5/402=1%). For untreated patients, subsequent treatment within one year of the initial visit was low and similar in both eras (35%). Conclusion There continues to be a need to screen patients born between 1945 and 1965 for HCV as well as to identify increasing numbers of patients below this age cohort. Even though current therapies are oral, highly effective, and can be 8-12 weeks in duration, significant numbers of patients were not treated within a year of first visit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.