Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37155234›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Perceptions on Oral Ulcers From Facebook Page Categories: Observational Study.

Suguna Simhadri, Sriha Yalamanchi, Sean Stone, Mythily Srinivasan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suguna Simhadri *Department of Oral Pathology, Medicine and Radiology, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3222-5206
Sriha Yalamanchi *Department of Oral Pathology, Medicine and Radiology, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2227-4956
Sean StoneIndiana University School of Dentistry, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-3070
Mythily SrinivasanDepartment of Oral Pathology, Medicine and Radiology, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1431-8215
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral ulcers are a common condition affecting a considerable proportion of the population, and they are often associated with trauma and stress. They are very painful, and interfere with eating. As they are usually considered an annoyance, people may turn to social media for potential management options. Facebook is one of the most commonly accessed social media platforms and is the primary source of news information, including health information, for a significant percentage of American adults. Given the increasing importance of social media as a source of health information, potential remedies, and prevention strategies, it is essential to understand the type and quality of information available on Facebook regarding oral ulcers.

objectiveThe goal of our study was to evaluate information on recurrent oral ulcers that can be accessed via the most popular social media network-Facebook.

methodsWe performed a keyword search of Facebook pages on 2 consecutive days in March 2022, using duplicate, newly created accounts, and then anonymized all posts. The collected pages were filtered, using predefined criteria to include only English-language pages wherein oral ulcer information was posted by the general public and to exclude pages created by professional dentists, associated professionals, organizations, and academic researchers. The selected pages were then screened for page origin and Facebook categories.

resultsOur initial keyword search yielded 517 pages; interestingly however, only 112 (22%) of pages had information relevant to oral ulcers, and 405 (78%) had irrelevant information, with ulcers being mentioned in relation to other parts of the human body. Excluding professional pages and pages without relevant posts resulted in 30 pages, of which 9 (30%) were categorized as "health/beauty" pages or as "product/service" pages, 3 (10%) were categorized as "medical & health" pages, and 5 (17%) were categorized as "community" pages. Majority of the pages (22/30, 73%) originated from 6 countries; most originated from the United States (7 pages), followed by India (6 pages). There was little information on oral ulcer prevention, long-term treatment, and complications.

conclusionsFacebook, in oral ulcer information dissemination, appears to be primarily used as an adjunct to business enterprises for marketing or for enhancing access to a product. Consequently, it was unsurprising that there was little information on oral ulcer prevention, long-term treatment, and complications. Although we made efforts to identify and select Facebook pages related to oral ulcers, we did not manually verify the authenticity or accuracy of the pages included in our analysis, potentially limiting the reliability of our findings or resulting in bias toward specific products or services. Although this work forms something of a pilot project, we plan to expand the project to encompass text mining for content analysis and include multiple social media platforms in the future.

Indexed as

apthous stomatitiscold soreFacebookinformationinternetoral ulcer

Identifiers

PMID37155234
PMCPMC10203927
OpenAlexW4323059882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.