Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37155224›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2023

Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2 in the German Population.

Kai Schulze-Wundling, Patrick Frank Ottensmeyer, Kristin Maria Meyer-Schlinkmann, Marek Deckena, Stefan Krüger, Simon Schlinkert, Axel Budde, Dieter Münstermann, Nicole Töpfner, Astrid Petersmann and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nationwide population-based infection- and vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in Germany in autumn/winter 2021/2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai Schulze-WundlingInstitute of Virology, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University Bonn; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Locations: Bonn - Cologne, Hannover - Brunswick Medical Care Center Laboratory Krone GbR, Bad Salzuflen; dimap - Institute for Market and Political Research, Bonn; Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden; Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Oldenburg; Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Greifswald Medical School, and German; Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Location Greifswald, Greifswald Medical School; Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Westphalian Wilhelms University of Münster; Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen.
Patrick Frank Ottensmeyer
Kristin Maria Meyer-Schlinkmann
Marek Deckena
Stefan Krüger
Simon Schlinkert
Axel Budde
Dieter Münstermann
Nicole Töpfner
Astrid Petersmann
Matthias Nauck
André Karch
Berit Lange
Sabine Blaschke
Carsten Tiemann
Hendrik Streeck
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, national population-based seroprevalence surveys were conducted in some countries; however, this was not done in Germany. In particular, no seroprevalence surveys were planned for the summer of 2022. In the context of the IMMUNEBRIDGE project, the GUIDE study was carried out to estimate seroprevalence on the national and regional levels.

methodsTo obtain an overview of the population-wide immunity against SARS-CoV-2 among adults in Germany that would be as statistically robust as possible, serological tests were carried out using self-sampling dried blood spot cards in conjunction with surveys, one by telephone and one online. Blood samples were analyzed for the presence of antibodies to the S and N antigens of SARS-CoV-2.

resultsAmong the 15 932 participants, antibodies to the S antigen were detected in 95.7%, and to the N antigen in 44.4%. In the higher-risk age groups of persons aged 65 and above and persons aged 80 and above, anti-S antibodies were found in 97,4% and 98.8%, respectively. Distinct regional differences in the distribution of anti-S and anti-N antibodies emerged. Immunity gaps were found both regionally and in particular subgroups of the population. High anti-N antibody levels were especially common in eastern German states, and high anti-S antibody levels in western German states.

conclusionThese findings indicate that a large percentage of the adult German population has formed antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This will markedly lower the probability of an overburdening of the health care system by hospitalization and high occupancy of intensive care units due to future SARS-CoV-2 waves, depending on the viral characteristics of then prevailing variants.

Indexed as

CardiologyCOVID-19AdultGermanyHospitalizationHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37155224
PMCPMC10408282
OpenAlexW4362606971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.