Trial reportJAMA network open2023
Effectiveness of Genotype-Specific Tricyclic Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03548675 (Pharmacogenetics to Improve Personalized Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Severe Depression;a Randomized Controlled Trial Using Tricyclic Antidepressants), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pharmacogenetics to Improve Personalized Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Severe Depression;a Randomized Controlled Trial Using Tricyclic Antidepressants
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.BMJ mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence level for pharmacogenetic testing in antidepressant treatment: a systematic review.PharmacogenomicsPooled it
- A comparison between rTMS and antidepressant medication on depressive symptom clusters in treatment-resistant depression.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Trial
- Optimizing Nortriptyline Dosing: A Comparison between Pharmacogenetics-Based, Phenotype-Based, and Standard Dosing.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Trial
- Patient views on receiving a pharmacogenetic passport - a mixed methods study exploring experiences and use after an opportunistic offer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Large-scale analysis demonstrates the influence of CYP2C19 genotype on specific SSRI side effects.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Effect of Venlafaxine on Inflammatory Level in Patients with Depression.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- CYP2D6 Metabolizer Status Does Not Predict Response or Tolerability of Low-Dose Nortriptyline for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Pharmacogenetics and the Response to Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Associations between physical activities and self-harm behaviour in depression across the genotype: findings from the UK biobank.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Persistent benefit of pharmacogenomic testing on initial remission and response rates in patients with major depressive disorder.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenetics: Opportunities for theAnnual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2025Review
- Review
- Association of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 metabolizer status with switching and discontinuing antidepressant drugs: an exploratory study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Drug-Gene Risk Stratification in Patients with Suspected Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease.Drug safety · 2024Observational
- A review of real-world evidence on preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for preventing adverse drug reactions: a reality for future health care.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Review
- A New Intervention for Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in Psychiatry: A Description of the PSY-PGx Clinical Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring perceived barriers and attitudes in young adults towards antidepressant pharmacotherapy, including the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing to optimize prescription practices.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Evidence of the clinical benefit of pharmacogenetics-informed treatment (PIT) with antidepressants is still limited. Especially for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), pharmacogenetics may be of interest because therapeutic plasma concentrations are well defined, identification of optimal dosing can be time consuming, and treatment is frequently accompanied by adverse effects. Objective: To determine whether PIT results in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA plasma concentrations compared with usual treatment in patients with unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial compared PIT with usual treatment among 111 patients at 4 centers in the Netherlands. Patients were treated with the TCAs nortriptyline, clomipramine, or imipramine, with clinical follow-up of 7 weeks. Patients were enrolled from June 1, 2018, to January 1, 2022. At inclusion, patients had unipolar nonpsychotic MDD (with a score of ≥19 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAMD-17]), were aged 18 to 65 years, and were eligible for TCA treatment. Main exclusion criteria were a bipolar or psychotic disorder, substance use disorder, pregnancy, interacting comedications, and concurrent use of psychotropic medications. Intervention: In the PIT group, the initial TCA dosage was based on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes. The control group received usual treatment, which comprised the standard initial TCA dosage. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was days until attainment of a therapeutic TCA plasma concentration. Secondary outcomes were severity of depressive symptoms (measured by HAMD-17 scores) and frequency and severity of adverse effects (measured by Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating scores). Results: Of 125 patients randomized, 111 (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [13.3] years; 69 [62.2%] female) were included in the analysis; of those, 56 were in the PIT group and 55 were in the control group. The PIT group reached therapeutic concentrations faster than the control group (mean [SD], 17.3 [11.2] vs 22.0 [10.2] days; Kaplan-Meier χ21 = 4.30; P = .04). No significant difference in reduction of depressive symptoms was observed. Linear mixed-model analyses showed that the interaction between group and time differed for the frequency (F6,125 = 4.03; P = .001), severity (F6,114 = 3.10; P = .008), and burden (F6,112 = 2.56; P = .02) of adverse effects, suggesting that adverse effects decreased relatively more for those receiving PIT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, PIT resulted in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA concentrations, with potentially fewer and less severe adverse effects. No effect on depressive symptoms was observed. These findings indicate that pharmacogenetics-informed dosing of TCAs can be safely applied and may be useful in personalizing treatment for patients with MDD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548675.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.