Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37155164›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effectiveness of Genotype-Specific Tricyclic Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cornelis F Vos, Sophie E Ter Hark, Arnt F A Schellekens, Jan Spijker, Annemarie van der Meij, Anne J Grotenhuis, Raluca Mihaescu, Wietske Kievit, Rogier Donders, Rob E Aarnoutse and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03548675 (Pharmacogenetics to Improve Personalized Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Severe Depression;a Randomized Controlled Trial Using Tricyclic Antidepressants), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548675 phase4completednot on this map

Pharmacogenetics to Improve Personalized Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Severe Depression;a Randomized Controlled Trial Using Tricyclic Antidepressants

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2018 to 2022Enrolled125ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsTCA treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacogenetics: Opportunities for theAnnual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2025
    Review
  14. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genes · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelis F VosDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sophie E Ter HarkDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Arnt F A SchellekensDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jan SpijkerDepression Expertise Centre, Pro Persona, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Annemarie van der MeijDepression Expertise Centre, Pro Persona, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Anne J GrotenhuisDutch Depression Society, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Raluca MihaescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Wietske KievitDepartment of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rogier DondersDepartment of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rob E AarnoutseDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marieke J H CoenenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Joost G E JanzingDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLPro Persona · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Evidence of the clinical benefit of pharmacogenetics-informed treatment (PIT) with antidepressants is still limited. Especially for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), pharmacogenetics may be of interest because therapeutic plasma concentrations are well defined, identification of optimal dosing can be time consuming, and treatment is frequently accompanied by adverse effects. Objective: To determine whether PIT results in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA plasma concentrations compared with usual treatment in patients with unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial compared PIT with usual treatment among 111 patients at 4 centers in the Netherlands. Patients were treated with the TCAs nortriptyline, clomipramine, or imipramine, with clinical follow-up of 7 weeks. Patients were enrolled from June 1, 2018, to January 1, 2022. At inclusion, patients had unipolar nonpsychotic MDD (with a score of ≥19 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAMD-17]), were aged 18 to 65 years, and were eligible for TCA treatment. Main exclusion criteria were a bipolar or psychotic disorder, substance use disorder, pregnancy, interacting comedications, and concurrent use of psychotropic medications. Intervention: In the PIT group, the initial TCA dosage was based on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes. The control group received usual treatment, which comprised the standard initial TCA dosage. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was days until attainment of a therapeutic TCA plasma concentration. Secondary outcomes were severity of depressive symptoms (measured by HAMD-17 scores) and frequency and severity of adverse effects (measured by Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating scores). Results: Of 125 patients randomized, 111 (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [13.3] years; 69 [62.2%] female) were included in the analysis; of those, 56 were in the PIT group and 55 were in the control group. The PIT group reached therapeutic concentrations faster than the control group (mean [SD], 17.3 [11.2] vs 22.0 [10.2] days; Kaplan-Meier χ21 = 4.30; P = .04). No significant difference in reduction of depressive symptoms was observed. Linear mixed-model analyses showed that the interaction between group and time differed for the frequency (F6,125 = 4.03; P = .001), severity (F6,114 = 3.10; P = .008), and burden (F6,112 = 2.56; P = .02) of adverse effects, suggesting that adverse effects decreased relatively more for those receiving PIT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, PIT resulted in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA concentrations, with potentially fewer and less severe adverse effects. No effect on depressive symptoms was observed. These findings indicate that pharmacogenetics-informed dosing of TCAs can be safely applied and may be useful in personalizing treatment for patients with MDD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548675.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMajor Depressive DisorderAdultAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleNortriptylineAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicNortriptyline

Identifiers

PMID37155164
PMCPMC10167565
OpenAlexW4375955758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.