Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37154944›Full record

Observational studyActa diabetologica2023

Artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: clinical assessment using handheld fundus camera in a real-life setting.

Marco Lupidi, Luca Danieli, Daniela Fruttini, Michele Nicolai, Nicola Lassandro, Jay Chhablani, Cesare Mariotti

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta diabetologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modern Approach to Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco Lupidi *Eye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. marcomed2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6817-2488
Luca Danieli *IRCCS - Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Daniela FruttiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Michele NicolaiEye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Nicola LassandroEye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Jay ChhablaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Cesare MariottiEye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITFondazione G.B. Bietti · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDiabetic retinopathy (DR) represents the main cause of vision loss among working age people. A prompt screening of this condition may prevent its worst complications. This study aims to validate the in-built artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm Selena+ of a handheld fundus camera (Optomed Aurora, Optomed, Oulu, Finland) in a first line screening of a real-world clinical setting.

methodsIt was an observational cross-sectional study including 256 eyes of 256 consecutive patients. The sample included both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Each patient received a 50°, macula centered, non-mydriatic fundus photography and, after pupil dilation, a complete fundus examination by an experienced retina specialist. All images were after analyzed by a skilled operator and by the AI algorithm. The results of the three procedures were then compared.

resultsThe agreement between the operator-based fundus analysis in bio-microscopy and the fundus photographs was of 100%. Among the DR patients the AI algorithm revealed signs of DR in 121 out of 125 subjects (96.8%) and no signs of DR 122 of the 126 non-diabetic patients (96.8%). The sensitivity of the AI algorithm was 96.8% and the specificity 96.8%. The overall concordance coefficient k (95% CI) between AI-based assessment and fundus biomicroscopy was 0.935 (0.891-0.979).

conclusionsThe Aurora fundus camera is effective in a first line screening of DR. Its in-built AI software can be considered a reliable tool to automatically identify the presence of signs of DR and therefore employed as a promising resource in large screening campaigns.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMass ScreeningRetinaArtificial intelligenceDiabetic retinopathyHandheld fundus camerasScreening

Identifiers

PMID37154944
PMCPMC10166040
OpenAlexW4375956206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.