Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37154941›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Contribution of collegial support meetings (CSM) in the management of complex situations of patients with advanced cancer.

Caroline Poisson, Christine Mateus, Anda Sampetrean, Perrine Renard, Florian Scotte, Benjamin Verret, Jamila Mardaghi, Sarah Dauchy, Laurence Vigouret-Viant, Sarah N Dumont and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline PoissonSupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France. caroline.poisson@gustaveroussy.fr.
Christine MateusSupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Anda SampetreanSupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Perrine RenardSupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Florian ScotteSupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Benjamin VerretOncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Jamila MardaghiMedical Information Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Sarah DauchySupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Laurence Vigouret-ViantSupportive Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Sarah N DumontOncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
François BlotEthics Committee and Intensive Care Unit Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCollegial support meetings (CSM) have been set up in the Gustave Roussy Cancer Center for inpatients whose complex care requires a multi-professional approach involving many participants: oncologists but also health-caregivers, a member of the palliative care team, an intensivist, and a psychologist. This study is aimed at describing the role of this newly multidisciplinary meeting implemented in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center.

methodsEach week, the health-caregivers decide which situations should be examined, depending on the difficulty of a case. The discussion goes on to include the goal of treatment, the intensity of care, ethical and psychosocial issues, and the patient's life plan. Finally, to obtain feedback from the teams, a survey has been distributed to assess the interest in the CSM.

resultsIn 2020, 114 inpatients were involved, and 91% were in an advanced palliative situation. During the CSMs, 55% of the discussions focused on whether to continue specific cancer treatment-29% about whether to continue invasive medical care-50% about optimizing supportive care. We estimate that between 65 and 75% of CSMs influenced further decisions. Death occurred during the hospitalization for 35% of the patients that were discussed. The lapse of time between last chemotherapy and death was 24 days (IQR, 28.5). CSMs were well received, since 80% of the teams find these meetings useful.

conclusionsCSMs reach conclusions for medical and nursing staff involved, in order to improve the management of inpatients with cancer in advanced palliative situation and to define the better goals of care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansInpatientsPalliative CareAdvanced cancerComplex patientsDecision makingMultidisciplinary meetings

Identifiers

PMID37154941
OpenAlexW4375864671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.