Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37154879›Full record

ReviewArchives of sexual behavior2023

Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate.

Zsófia Csajbók, Zuzana Štěrbová, Gayle Brewer, Cristina A Cândea, Charlotte J S De Backer, Ana Maria Fernández, Maryanne L Fisher, Justin R Garcia, Daniel J Kruger, Karlijn Massar and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of sexual behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Zsófia CsajbókFaculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana ŠtěrbováFaculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Gayle BrewerInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Cristina A CândeaFaculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Charlotte J S De BackerDepartment of Communication Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ana Maria FernándezFaculty of Humanities, University of Santiago of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Maryanne L FisherDepartment of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Canada.
Justin R GarciaKinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Daniel J KrugerInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Karlijn MassarDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Elisabeth OberzaucherDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katinka J P QuintelierSchool of Business and Economics, Management and Organisation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Renske E van GeffenAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jaroslava Varella ValentovaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Correa VarellaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Peter K JonasonDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia, 12, 35131, Padua, PD, Italy. peterkarl.jonason@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8833-048X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate value is an important concept in mate choice research although its operationalization and understanding are limited. Here, we reviewed and evaluated previously established conceptual and methodological approaches measuring mate value and presented original research using individual differences in how people view themselves as a face-valid proxy for mate value in long- and short-term contexts. In data from 41 nations (N = 3895, M

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorIndividualityAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersYoung AdultAttractivenessDark TriadMate desirabilityMate valueMatingSex differences

Identifiers

PMID37154879
PMCPMC10501943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.