Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37154869›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Understanding the patient and family experience of nutrition and dietetic support during childhood cancer treatment.

Emma Clarke, Gemma Pugh, Eveline van den Heuvel, Mark Winstanley, Andrew C Wood, Stephen J Laughton, Amy L Lovell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Nutrition Support Interventions for Children and Young People Treated for Osteosarcoma: A Scoping Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma ClarkeThe University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Gemma PughNational Child Cancer Network, Te Aho O Te Kahu Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand.
Eveline van den HeuvelStarship Blood and Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mark WinstanleyStarship Blood and Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew C WoodStarship Blood and Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand.
Stephen J LaughtonStarship Blood and Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand.
Amy L LovellThe University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. a.lovell@auckland.ac.nz.
Starship Children's Health · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZCancer Society of New Zealand · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to understand the experience of families caring for a child with cancer in New Zealand (NZ) who received nutrition and dietetic support during cancer treatment and their preferences for the delivery, format, and timing of nutrition information.

methodsChildhood cancer patients and their families (N = 21) participated in a mixed-methods study at a specialist paediatric oncology centre in Auckland, NZ. Before the semi-structured interview, participants completed a questionnaire capturing demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics of their child, their nutrition concerns, and their information needs. Quantitative data were described, and qualitative thematic analysis of the semi-structured interviews was performed using NVivo data analysis software.

resultsEighty-six percent of participants indicated they had concerns about their child's nutrition during treatment. The most common concerns were anorexia, vomiting, and weight loss. While many were happy with the quality of the nutrition support received, one-third of the patients wanted more support. Four key themes emerged from the interviews: (1) patients experience significant and distressing nutrition challenges; (2) patients and families have mixed perceptions of EN; (3) there are gaps in the current nutrition support system for inpatients; and (4) a desire for more accessible nutrition support.

conclusionChildhood cancer patients and families experience significant and distressing nutrition challenges during treatment. Standardising information given to patients and their families may optimise nutrition support for paediatric oncology patients and reduce the discordance between families and health professionals. Future implementation of a nutrition decision aid in this population is warranted.

Indexed as

DieteticsNeoplasmsChildHumansInpatientsMedical OncologyNutritional StatusQualitative ResearchChildhood cancerNutrition supportPatient perspectives

Identifiers

PMID37154869
PMCPMC10167176
OpenAlexW4375955092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.