Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37154705›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2023

Comparison of machine learning techniques in prediction of mortality following cardiac surgery: analysis of over 220 000 patients from a large national database.

Shubhra Sinha, Tim Dong, Arnaldo Dimagli, Hunaid A Vohra, Chris Holmes, Umberto Benedetto, Gianni D Angelini

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as an Alternative to the EuroSCORE II in Estimating Cardiac Surgery Risk.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardiac Surgery During and After the Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis of UK Trends and Outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A machine learning algorithm-based risk prediction score for in-hospital/30-day mortality after adult cardiac surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shubhra SinhaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8554-6704
Tim DongDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1953-0063
Arnaldo DimagliDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Hunaid A VohraDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris HolmesAlan Turing Institute, London, UK.
Umberto BenedettoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gianni D AngeliniDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-7080

Funding

British Heart Foundation-Turing researchNIHR Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Bristol
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo perform a systematic comparison of in-hospital mortality risk prediction post-cardiac surgery, between the predominant scoring system-European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II, logistic regression (LR) retrained on the same variables and alternative machine learning techniques (ML)-random forest (RF), neural networks (NN), XGBoost and weighted support vector machine.

methodsRetrospective analyses of prospectively routinely collected data on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the UK from January 2012 to March 2019. Data were temporally split 70:30 into training and validation subsets. Mortality prediction models were created using the 18 variables of EuroSCORE II. Comparisons of discrimination, calibration and clinical utility were then conducted. Changes in model performance, variable-importance over time and hospital/operation-based model performance were also reviewed.

resultsOf the 227 087 adults who underwent cardiac surgery during the study period, there were 6258 deaths (2.76%). In the testing cohort, there was an improvement in discrimination [XGBoost (95% confidence interval (CI) area under the receiver operator curve (AUC), 0.834-0.834, F1 score, 0.276-0.280) and RF (95% CI AUC, 0.833-0.834, F1, 0.277-0.281)] compared with EuroSCORE II (95% CI AUC, 0.817-0.818, F1, 0.243-0.245). There was no significant improvement in calibration with ML and retrained-LR compared to EuroSCORE II. However, EuroSCORE II overestimated risk across all deciles of risk and over time. The calibration drift was lowest in NN, XGBoost and RF compared with EuroSCORE II. Decision curve analysis showed XGBoost and RF to have greater net benefit than EuroSCORE II.

conclusionsML techniques showed some statistical improvements over retrained-LR and EuroSCORE II. The clinical impact of this improvement is modest at present. However the incorporation of additional risk factors in future studies may improve upon these findings and warrants further study.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresAdultHospital MortalityHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBenchmarkingCardiac surgeryMachine learningMortality predictionRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID37154705
PMCPMC10275911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.