ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Minimally invasive treatment for glioblastoma through endoscopic surgery including tumor embolization when necessary: a technical note.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative embolization for glioblastoma surgery: A scoping review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Environmental Hazards and Glial Brain Tumors: Association or Causation?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although there have been some reports on endoscopic glioblastoma surgery, the indication has been limited to deep-seated lesions, and the difficulty of hemostasis has been a concern. In that light, we attempted to establish an endoscopic procedure for excision of glioblastoma which could be applied even to hypervascular or superficial lesions, in combination with pre-operative endovascular tumor embolization. Methods: Medical records of six consecutive glioblastoma patients who received exclusive endoscopic removal between September and November 2020 were analyzed. Preoperative tumor embolization was performed in cases with marked tumor stain and proper feeder arteries having an abnormal shape, for instance, tortuous or dilated, without passing through branches to the normal brain. Endoscopic tumor removal through a key-hole craniotomy was performed by using an inside-out excision for a deep-seated lesion, with the addition of an outside-in extirpation for a shallow portion when needed. Results: Endoscopic removal was successfully performed in all six cases. Before resection, endovascular tumor embolization was performed in four cases with no resulting complications, including ischemia or brain swelling. Gross total resection was achieved in three cases, and near total resection in the other three cases. Intraoperative blood loss exceeded 1,000 ml in only one case, whose tumor showed a prominent tumor stain but no proper feeder artery for embolization. In all patients, a smooth transition to adjuvant therapy was possible with no surgical site infection. Conclusion: Endoscopic removal for glioblastoma was considered to be a promising procedure with minimal invasiveness and a favorable impact on prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.