Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37153672›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

An artificial intelligence-based approach for identifying rare disease patients using retrospective electronic health records applied for Pompe disease.

Simon Lin, Jama Nateqi, Rafael Weingartner-Ortner, Stefanie Gruarin, Hannes Marling, Vinzenz Pilgram, Florian B Lagler, Elmar Aigner, Alistair G Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon Lin *Science Department, Symptoma GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Jama Nateqi *Science Department, Symptoma GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Rafael Weingartner-OrtnerScience Department, Symptoma GmbH, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefanie GruarinScience Department, Symptoma GmbH, Salzburg, Austria.
Hannes MarlingScience Department, Symptoma GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Vinzenz PilgramMedical and Information Technology - MIT, University Hospital Salzburg (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Florian B LaglerMedical and Information Technology - MIT, University Hospital Salzburg (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Elmar AignerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Alistair G MartinScience Department, Symptoma GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Unfallkrankenhaus Salzburg · ATParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We retrospectively screened 350,116 electronic health records (EHRs) to identify suspected patients for Pompe disease. Using these suspected patients, we then describe their phenotypical characteristics and estimate the prevalence in the respective population covered by the EHRs. Methods: We applied Symptoma's Artificial Intelligence-based approach for identifying rare disease patients to retrospective anonymized EHRs provided by the "University Hospital Salzburg" clinic group. Within 1 month, the AI screened 350,116 EHRs reaching back 15 years from five hospitals, and 104 patients were flagged as probable for Pompe disease. Flagged patients were manually reviewed and assessed by generalist and specialist physicians for their likelihood for Pompe disease, from which the performance of the algorithms was evaluated. Results: Of the 104 patients flagged by the algorithms, generalist physicians found five "diagnosed," 10 "suspected," and seven patients with "reduced suspicion." After feedback from Pompe disease specialist physicians, 19 patients remained clinically plausible for Pompe disease, resulting in a specificity of 18.27% for the AI. Estimating from the remaining plausible patients, the prevalence of Pompe disease for the greater Salzburg region [incl. Bavaria (Germany), Styria (Austria), and Upper Austria (Austria)] was one in every 18,427 people. Phenotypes for patient cohorts with an approximated onset of symptoms above or below 1 year of age were established, which correspond to infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) and late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), respectively. Conclusion: Our study shows the feasibility of Symptoma's AI-based approach for identifying rare disease patients using retrospective EHRs. Via the algorithm's screening of an entire EHR population, a physician had only to manually review 5.47 patients on average to find one suspected candidate. This efficiency is crucial as Pompe disease, while rare, is a progressively debilitating but treatable neuromuscular disease. As such, we demonstrated both the efficiency of the approach and the potential of a scalable solution to the systematic identification of rare disease patients. Thus, similar implementation of this methodology should be encouraged to improve care for all rare disease patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)electronic health records (EHR)orphan diseasePompe disease (glycogen storage disease type II)rare disease (RD)retrospective screening

Identifiers

PMID37153672
PMCPMC10160659
OpenAlexW4366773597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.