ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Abnormal intraepidermal nerve fiber density in disease: A scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microtubule Cytoskeleton Dysfunction in Chronic Pain: Mechanisms of Transport Failure and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Lymphovenous Bypass as an Adjunct to Standard Care for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Protocol for a Randomized Assessor-Blinded Superiority Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Lymphotoxin-beta receptor controls the development of chronic pain.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Optical coherence tomography and histological assessment of cutaneous vasculature and neural changes in long-term smokers: an exploratory study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Quantification of the Mouse Hind Paw Footpads: A Detailed and Simplified Protocol.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Molecular Characterization of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: The Complex Spectrum of Painful Manifestations.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Article
- Review
- Novel three-dimensional analysis method for accurate evaluation of cutaneous small sensory nerve fibers in mice.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2025Article
- Enhanced CXCL10 expression in mast cells for cutaneous neurofibroma presenting with pain and itch.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy: from molecular mechanisms to clinical management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Psychophysical and Functional Outcomes in Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy After Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Narrative Review and Case Series.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024Review
- Review
- Deciphering nociplastic pain: clinical features, risk factors and potential mechanisms.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Discontinuity third harmonic generation microscopy for label-free imaging and quantification of intraepidermal nerve fibers.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Sustained corneal nerve loss predicts the development of diabetic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Review
- From Sudoscan to bedside: theory, modalities, and application of electrochemical skin conductance in medical diagnostics.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) has become an important biomarker for neuropathy diagnosis and research. The consequences of reduced IENFD can include sensory dysfunction, pain, and a significant decrease in quality of life. We examined the extent to which IENFD is being used as a tool in human and mouse models and compared the degree of fiber loss between diseases to gain a broader understanding of the existing data collected using this common technique. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of publications that used IENFD as a biomarker in human and non-human research. PubMed was used to identify 1,004 initial articles that were then screened to select articles that met the criteria for inclusion. Criteria were chosen to standardize publications so they could be compared rigorously and included having a control group, measuring IENFD in a distal limb, and using protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5). Results: We analyzed 397 articles and collected information related to publication year, the condition studied, and the percent IENFD loss. The analysis revealed that the use of IENFD as a tool has been increasing in both human and non-human research. We found that IENFD loss is prevalent in many diseases, and metabolic or diabetes-related diseases were the most studied conditions in humans and rodents. Our analysis identified 73 human diseases in which IENFD was affected, with 71 reporting IENFD loss and an overall average IENFD change of -47%. We identified 28 mouse and 21 rat conditions, with average IENFD changes of -31.6% and -34.7%, respectively. Additionally, we present data describing sub-analyses of IENFD loss according to disease characteristics in diabetes and chemotherapy treatments in humans and rodents. Interpretation: Reduced IENFD occurs in a surprising number of human disease conditions. Abnormal IENFD contributes to important complications, including poor cutaneous vascularization, sensory dysfunction, and pain. Our analysis informs future rodent studies so they may better mirror human diseases impacted by reduced IENFD, highlights the breadth of diseases impacted by IENFD loss, and urges exploration of common mechanisms that lead to substantial IENFD loss as a complication in disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.