Comparison between ozone column depths and methane lifetimes computed by one- and three-dimensional models at different atmospheric O

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Possible favored great oxidation event scenario on exoplanets around M-stars with the example of TRAPPIST-1e.Scientific reports · 2026
   Article
2. Atmospheric oxygen and methane on the early Earth.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
   Review
3. Evolution of the iodine cycle and the late stabilization of the Earth's ozone layer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
   Article
4. Comparison between ozone column depths and methane lifetimes computed by one- and three-dimensional models at different atmospheric ORoyal Society open science · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as