Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37153314›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Acute Correction of Femoral Malrotation After Intramedullary Nailing Using an Intraoperative Digital Protractor.

Joshua Goethals, Daniel R Cavazos, Marek Denisiuk, Ryan Bray, Kerellos Nasr, Rahul Vaidya

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Femoral diaphysis malunion: An overview.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Restoration of calcaneal anatomy and physiologic function after fracture: the importance of tuber length.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua GoethalsOrthopaedic Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Daniel R CavazosOrthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Marek DenisiukOrthopaedic Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Ryan BrayOrthopaedic Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Kerellos NasrOrthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Rahul VaidyaOrthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Detroit Medical Center · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of the study is to diagnose and accurately correct malrotation of femur fractures after intramedullary (IM) nailing. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn institutional review board (IRB) approved prospective study that was performed at a U.S. level 1 trauma center. After IM nailing of comminuted femur fractures, a computed tomography (CT) scanogram was routinely performed to detect the difference in the postoperative femoral version. Patients with malalignment greater than 15 degrees compared to the contralateral side were informed about the discrepancy and offered to have it acutely corrected. A four-pin technique was used: two Schanz pins were used for measuring angles and two different pins were used to turn and correct the malalignment. The pin in the distal fragment is placed directly under the nail to prevent shortening in comminuted fractures. The nail was unlocked either proximally for retrograde nails or distally for antegrade nails. The Bonesetter Angle application was used as a digital protractor to intraoperatively measure the two reference pins and correct the malrotation. Alternate holes were used for relocking the nail. All patients received a CT scanogram after correction.

results19/128 patients with comminuted femoral fractures over five years with malrotations between 18 and 47 degrees were included in the study with an average malrotation of 24.7 + 8 degrees. All patients were corrected to an average of 4.0 +/- 2.1 degrees difference, as compared to the contralateral side (range 0-8). No patients required further surgeries to correct malrotation.

conclusionComminuted fractures with malrotation >15 degrees after femoral nailing have an incidence of 15% at our institution. This technique provides an efficient and accurate correction method with the use of an intraoperative digital protractor, avoiding the need for revision IM nailing or osteotomies.

Indexed as

ct scanogramfemoral anteversionfemoral malrotationiatrogenic lldinherent anteversionintramedullary nailinglow dose ctprospect trialretroversionsecond generation nail

Identifiers

PMID37153314
PMCPMC10158846
OpenAlexW4362551104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.