Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37153269›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Identifying Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis in Children Through Clinical Variables Using Machine Learning.

Yoshifumi Miyagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoshifumi MiyagiDepartment of Pediatrics, Haibara General Hospital, Shizuoka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is the most common bacterial cause of pharyngitis in children. GAS pharyngitis requires antimicrobial agents, and rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) are currently considered useful for diagnosis. However, the decision to perform the test is based on the pediatrician's examination findings, but the indicators are not clear. Therefore, we used machine learning (ML) to create a model to identify GAS pharyngitis from clinical findings and to explore important features. Methods ML with Python programming language was used for this study. Data from the included study involved 676 children aged 3 to 15 years diagnosed with pharyngitis, with positive results on the RADT serving as exposures, and negative results serving as controls. The ML performances served as the outcome. We utilized six types of ML classifiers, namely, logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor algorithm, random forest, an ensemble of them, Voting Classifier, and the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Additionally, we used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to identify important features. Results Moderately performing models were generated for all six ML classifiers. XGBoost produced the best model, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.75 ± 0.01. The order of important features in the model was palatal petechiae, followed by scarlatiniform rash, tender cervical lymph nodes, and age. Conclusion Through this study, we have demonstrated that ML models can predict childhood GAS pharyngitis with moderate accuracy using only commonly recorded clinical variables in children diagnosed with pharyngitis. We have also identified four important clinical variables. These findings may serve as a reference for considering indicators under the current guidelines recommended for selective RADTs.

Indexed as

aucchatgptclinical symptomsgroup a streptococcal pharyngitismachine learning (ml)xgboost

Identifiers

PMID37153269
PMCPMC10160315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.