Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37153105›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

Update on cryptogenic organizing pneumonia.

Elzbieta Radzikowska, Justyna Fijolek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elzbieta RadzikowskaIII Department of Lung Diseases and Oncology, National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Justyna FijolekIII Department of Lung Diseases and Oncology, National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) is a form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia that results from the pulmonary reaction to various unidentified injuries. Secondary organizing pneumonia is diagnosed when the triggering factor has been identified; it is mainly caused by infections, toxic substance exposure, drugs, connective tissue diseases, malignancies, autoimmune diseases, bone marrow, or organ transplantation, and radiotherapy. There has been an increase in the number of reports of drug-induced organizing pneumonia (OP). New biological therapies, interferon, monoclonal antibodies, anti-interleukin antibodies, and PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors may induce this specific pulmonary reaction. The classical form of COP is usually subacute and does not manifest as severe disease. Patients maintain sufficient respiratory function, and treatment with steroids is usually effective. Several specific forms of OP (e.g., the cicatricial variant or acute fibrinous type) have distinct clinical and histological features, require higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs, and have a worse prognosis. In the era of administering steroid-sparing therapies for the treatment of interstitial lung diseases, connective tissue dases, and other conditions, it is important to emphasize this type of therapy for patients with COP.

Indexed as

acute fibrinous organizing pneumoniacicatrices organizing pneumoniaclarithromycincryptogenic organizing pneumoniaprednisonesecondary organizing pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID37153105
PMCPMC10157489
OpenAlexW4366548477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.