ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023
Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testing.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Cross-Sectional Survey of Obstetrical Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Use of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for 22q11.2 Deletion.AJP reports · 2026Article
- Genetic counselors' perspectives on the expanded use of non-invasive prenatal testing.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Second Trimester Ultrasound Diagnosis of External Hydrocephalus in Two Fetuses with Noonan Syndrome-Case Report Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Cell-Free DNA Results Indicating Mosaic Monosomy X of Likely Maternal Origin: Impact on Genetic Counseling Practices and Patient Experiences.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the clinical utility of NIPT-plus and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- The Predictive Accuracy of Anogenital Distance and Genital Tubercle Angle for First-Trimester Fetal Sex Determination.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues.Genes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.