Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Mendelian randomization analysis does not reveal a causal influence of mental diseases on osteoporosis.
Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Bidirectional Causal Effects of Alzheimer's Disease Across Multiple Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mendelian Randomization Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Mendelian randomization studies of risk and protective factors for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Unveiling the Causal Relationship Between Osteoporosis and Circulating Metabolites from a Genetic Perspective.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2025Article
- A-485 alleviates postmenopausal osteoporosis by activating GLUD1 deacetylation through the SENP1-Sirt3 signal pathway.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Inflammatory Bridges: Interconnections Between Alzheimer's Disease and Bone Health.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Exploring the nutritional status in adults with chronic schizophrenia: a cross-sectional study in Ecuador.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Causal link between mental disorders and gastrointestinal diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- The Association Between Antipsychotics and Bone Fragility: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Identification of heel bone mineral density as a risk factor of Alzheimer's disease by analyzing large-scale genome-wide association studies datasets.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis (OP) is primarily diagnosed through bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, and it often leads to fracture. Observational studies suggest that several mental diseases (MDs) may be linked to OP, but the causal direction of these associations remain unclear. This study aims to explore the potential causal association between five MDs (Schizophrenia, Depression, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Epilepsy) and the risk of OP. Methods: First, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were filtered from summary-level genome-wide association studies using quality control measures. Subsequently, we employed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to indirectly analyze the causal effect of MDs on the risk of OP through bone mineral density (in total body, femoral neck, lumbar spine, forearm, and heel) and fractures (in leg, arm, heel, spine, and osteoporotic fractures). Lastly, the causal effect of the MDs on the risk of OP was evaluated directly through OP. MR analysis was performed using several methods, including inverse variance weighting (IVW)-random effects, IVW-fixed effects, maximum likelihood, weighted median, MR-Egger regression, and penalized weighted median. Results: The results did not show any evidence of a causal relationship between MDs and the risk of OP (with almost all P values > 0.05). The robustness of the above results was proved to be good. Discussion: In conclusion, this study did not find evidence supporting the claim that MDs have a definitive impact on the risk of OP, which contradicts many existing observational reports. Further studies are needed to determine the potential mechanisms of the associations observed in observational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.