Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152904›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2023

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS FOR IMBALANCED POSITIVE-UNLABELLED DIAGNOSIS CODES IN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.

Ru Wang, Ye Liang, Zhuqi Miao, Tieming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ru WangDepartment of Statistics, Oklahoma State University.
Ye LiangDepartment of Statistics, Oklahoma State University.
Zhuqi MiaoSchool of Business, State University of New York at New Paltz.
Tieming LiuSchool of Industrial Engineering and Management, Oklahoma State University.

Funding

SCH: Harnessing Tensor Information to Improve EHR Data Quality for Accurate Data-driven Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy with Routine Lab ResultsR01EY033861 · NEI · OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY STILLWATER · PI LIU, TIEMING · 2021 to 2025
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR), significant progress has been made on developing predictive inference and algorithms by health data analysts and researchers. However, the EHR data are notoriously noisy due to missing and inaccurate inputs despite the information is abundant. One serious problem is that only a small portion of patients in the database has confirmatory diagnoses while many other patients remain undiagnosed because they did not comply with the recommended examinations. The phenomenon leads to a so-called positive-unlabelled situation and the labels are extremely imbalanced. In this paper, we propose a model-based approach to classify the unlabelled patients by using a Bayesian finite mixture model. We also discuss the label switching issue for the imbalanced data and propose a consensus Monte Carlo approach to address the imbalance issue and improve computational efficiency simultaneously. Simulation studies show that our proposed model-based approach outperforms existing positive-unlabelled learning algorithms. The proposed method is applied on the Cerner EHR for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients using laboratory measurements. With only 3% confirmatory diagnoses in the EHR database, we estimate the actual DR prevalence to be 25% which coincides with reported findings in the medical literature.

Indexed as

classificationconsensus Monte Carlodiabetic retinopathymultivariate t mixture

Identifiers

PMID37152904
PMCPMC10156089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.