Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152810›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

MRI-based classification of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status of gliomas using a 2.5D hybrid multi-task convolutional neural network.

Satrajit Chakrabarty, Pamela LaMontagne, Joshua Shimony, Daniel S Marcus, Aristeidis Sotiras

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Rapid detection of IDH mutations in gliomas by intraoperative mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satrajit ChakrabartyDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9664-4470
Pamela LaMontagneMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joshua ShimonyMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Daniel S MarcusMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Aristeidis SotirasMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-8820
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Sustaining the Integrative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research (I3CR) CenterU24CA258483 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Scott Marcus · 2021 to 2026
$4.4M
INTEGRATIVE IMAGING INFORMATICS FOR CANCER RESEARCHU24CA204854 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT, WAHL, RICHARD LEO · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HERSHEY, TAMARA G, MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOMEDICAL IMAGING COMPUTER RESOURCESS10RR022984 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2009 to 2009
$1.9M
GPU COMPUTING RESOURCE TO ENABLE INNOVATION IN IMAGING AND NETWORK BIOLOGYS10OD018091 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PAPPU, ROHIT V, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2014 to 2014
$598k
Acquisition of a next-generation computing clusterS10OD025200 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TOBIAS, MALCOLM · 2019 to 2019
$597k
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA204854NCI NIH HHS U24 CA258483NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022984NIH HHS S10 OD018091NIH HHS S10 OD025200NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status are important prognostic markers for glioma that are currently determined using invasive procedures. Our goal was to develop artificial intelligence-based methods to noninvasively determine molecular alterations from MRI. Methods: Pre-operative MRI scans of 2648 glioma patients were collected from Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM; Results: For IDH, the best-performing model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.925, 0.874, 0.933 and areas under the precision-recall curves (AUPRC) of 0.899, 0.702, 0.853 on the internal, WUSM, and EGD test sets, respectively. For 1p/19q, the best model achieved AUROCs of 0.782, 0.754, 0.842, and AUPRCs of 0.588, 0.713, 0.782, on those three data-splits, respectively. Conclusions: The high accuracy of the model on unseen data showcases its generalization capabilities and suggests its potential to perform "virtual biopsy" for tailoring treatment planning and overall clinical management of gliomas.

Indexed as

1p/19q codeletiondeep learninggliomaisocitrate dehydrogenaseoverall survival

Identifiers

PMID37152810
PMCPMC10162113
OpenAlexW4323363971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.