Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152752›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Influence of surface characteristics of implant materials on MRSA biofilm formation and effects of antimicrobial treatment.

Sven C J van Dun, Mariëlle Verheul, Bart G C W Pijls, Joffrey van Prehn, Henk Scheper, Federica Galli, Peter H Nibbering, Mark G J de Boer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sven C J van DunDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Mariëlle VerheulDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Bart G C W PijlsDepartment of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Joffrey van PrehnDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Henk ScheperDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Federica GalliLeiden Institute of Physics, Leiden, Netherlands.
Peter H NibberingDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Mark G J de BoerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: One of the main causes of treatment failure in bacterial prosthetic joint infections (PJI) is biofilm formation. The topography of the biofilm may be associated with susceptibility to antimicrobial treatment. The aims of this study were to assess differences in topography of biofilms on different implant materials and the correlation thereof with susceptibility to antimicrobial treatment. Methods: Methicillin-resistant Results: The biofilm surfaces on titanium alloys Ti-6Al-7Nb (Ra = 186 nm) and Ti-6Al-4V (Ra = 270 nm) were less rough than those of biofilms on silicone (Ra = 636 nm). The highest roughness was observed for biofilms on orthopedic bone cement with an Ra of 1,551 nm. Interestingly, the roughness parameters of the titanium alloys themselves were lower than the value for silicone, whereas the surface of the bone cement was the roughest. Treatment with 1- and 5-times the MBC of antibiotics resulted in inter-material differences in colony forming units (CFU) counts, ultimately showing comparable reductions of 2.4-3.0 log CFU/mL at the highest tested concentration. No significant differences in bacterial loads within MRSA biofilms were observed between the various implant materials, upon exposure to increasing concentrations of antibiotics. Discussion: The surface parameters of MRSA biofilms were determined by those of the implant materials on which they were formed. The antibiotic susceptibility of MRSA biofilms on the various tested implant materials did not differ, indicating that the efficacy of antibiotics was not affected by the roughness of the biofilm.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopy (AFM)biofilmMRSAPJIStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID37152752
PMCPMC10159048
OpenAlexW4366597333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.