Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152685›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Secondary infection of

Zhen Meng, Lele Zhai, Yanfeng Guo, Mengwei Zheng, Liang Li, Chongli Wen, Weiyu Zhang, Wenda Di

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Field Evidence ofVaccines · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhen MengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Lele ZhaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yanfeng GuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Mengwei ZhengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Liang LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Chongli WenGuangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Weiyu ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Wenda DiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Guangxi University · CNGuangxi Buffalo Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As a natural host of Methods: Buffaloes were assigned to three groups: group A (noninfected, Results: In the present study, no significant changes in Th1-type cytokines production were detected in early infection, both in primary and secondary infections, while the Th2-type response was strongly induced. A comparison of primary and secondary infection showed no significant difference in the cytokine secretion, which may indicate that the re-infection at 4 weeks after primary infection could not induce a robust adaptive immune response. The full extent of interaction between buffalo and

Indexed as

cytokineFasciola giganticaprimary infectionsecondary infectionsusceptible

Identifiers

PMID37152685
PMCPMC10157221
OpenAlexW4366548933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.