ArticleMethodsX2023
Semi-automated micro-computed tomography lung segmentation and analysis in mouse models.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D Evaluation of material-dependent volumetric and interfacial changes in CAD/CAM partial crowns: a semi-automated micro-CT approach.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Computed Tomography (CT) is a standard clinical tool utilized to diagnose known lung pathologies based on established grading methods. However, for preclinical trials and toxicity investigations in animal models, more comprehensive datasets are typically needed to determine discriminative features between experimental treatments, which oftentimes require analysis of multiple images and their associated differential quantification using manual segmentation methods. Furthermore, for manual segmentation of image data, three or more readers is the gold standard of analysis, but this requirement can be time-consuming and inefficient, depending on variability due to reader bias. In previous papers, microCT image manual segmentation was a valuable tool for assessment of lung pathology in several animal models; however, the manual segmentation approach and the commercial software used was typically a major rate-limiting step. To improve the efficiency, the semi-manual segmentation method was streamlined, and a semi-automated segmentation process was developed to produce:•Quantifiable segmentations: using manual and semi-automated analysis methods for assessing experimental injury and toxicity models,•Deterministic results and efficiency through automation in an unbiased and parameter free process, thereby reducing reader variance, user time, and increases throughput in data analysis,•Cost-Effectiveness: portable with low computational resource demand, based on a cross-platform open-source ImageJ program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.