ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Application of artificial intelligence for automatic cataract staging based on anterior segment images: comparing automatic segmentation approaches to manual segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Image-Based Deep Learning for Cataract Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis of the 5-year trends in literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in surgical care within low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of development, validation, and deployment.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound biomicroscopy analysis of age-related trends in lens stability in cortical cataracts.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based classification of multiple fundus diseases using ultra-widefield images.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in cataract grading system: a LOCS III-based hybrid model achieving high-precision classification.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Tools and methods for cataract recognition in low-resource settings: A narrative review.PLOS global public health · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based segmentation of caries, implants, fixed prosthesis, and restorations on bitewing radiographs: A retrospective study.Science progressArticle
- Automatic feature segmentation in dental panoramic radiographs.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cataract is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, accounting for >50% of cases of blindness in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, two artificial intelligence (AI) diagnosis platforms are proposed for cortical cataract staging to achieve a precise diagnosis. Methods: A total of 647 high quality anterior segment images, which included the four stages of cataracts, were collected into the dataset. They were divided randomly into a training set and a test set using a stratified random-allocation technique at a ratio of 8:2. Then, after automatic or manual segmentation of the lens area of the cataract, the deep transform-learning (DTL) features extraction, PCA dimensionality reduction, multi-features fusion, fusion features selection, and classification models establishment, the automatic and manual segmentation DTL platforms were developed. Finally, the accuracy, confusion matrix, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the two platforms. Results: In the automatic segmentation DTL platform, the accuracy of the model in the training and test sets was 94.59 and 84.50%, respectively. In the manual segmentation DTL platform, the accuracy of the model in the training and test sets was 97.48 and 90.00%, respectively. In the test set, the micro and macro average AUCs of the two platforms reached >95% and the AUC for each classification was >90%. The results of a confusion matrix showed that all stages, except for mature, had a high recognition rate. Conclusion: Two AI diagnosis platforms were proposed for cortical cataract staging. The resulting automatic segmentation platform can stage cataracts more quickly, whereas the resulting manual segmentation platform can stage cataracts more accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.