Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152547›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023

Cartilage Restoration for Isolated Patellar Chondral Defects: An Updated Systematic Review.

Eyal Ginesin, Nikil S Chari, Jacob Barnhart, Natalia Wojnowski, Ronak M Patel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment Options for Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Patellar cartilage repair-current concepts and evidence].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eyal GinesinIllinois Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.
Nikil S ChariChicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.
Jacob BarnhartChicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.
Natalia WojnowskiFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ronak M PatelIllinois Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.
Midwestern University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patellar chondral lesions can be particularly challenging to manage in younger and more active populations. Purpose: To synthesize, organize, and summarize the results and complication rates of various patellar cartilage restoration techniques. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We performed this systematic review according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Studies were included that reported on surgical treatment of patellar chondral defects with ≥5 patients and 12 months of follow-up data. Relevant demographic data from the included studies were extracted, and patient-reported outcome scores, visual analog scale for pain results, return-to-sport rate, complications, and concomitant procedures were documented. Results: There were 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 575 patients (male, n = 239; female, n = 336). In total, 6 surgical techniques were utilized. In 9 studies, the surgical procedure of choice was osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT); 8 studies evaluated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI); 3 evaluated advanced microfracture/autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis; 1 evaluated osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA); 1 evaluated particulate juvenile articulated cartilage; and 2 evaluated a synthetic osteochondral graft. No uniform functional outcome score or assessment was utilized across studies. OAT was predominantly used for smaller chondral lesions (<2 cm Conclusion: OAT and ACI were the most studied procedures for isolated patellar chondral defects. Advanced microfracture techniques showed promise, but indications (ie, size) and variability in techniques need to be elucidated in higher-level studies. Further prospective studies comparing OCA and matrix-induced ACI for larger patellar defects are necessary to determine the superior technique.

Indexed as

cartilagedefectspatellarestoration

Identifiers

PMID37152547
PMCPMC10161325
OpenAlexW4367857410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.