ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023
Comparative antibacterial effects of ginger and marjoram extract versus conventional irrigants on mature
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Plant-Derived Irrigants, Intracanal Medicaments, and Natural Compounds Against Enterococcus faecalis in Endodontics.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Phenolic compounds fromPharmaceutical biology · 2025Article
- Antibacterial efficacy and molecular docking analysis ofJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Potential Application ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Comparison of X-Ray Attenuation Performance, Antimicrobial Properties, and Cytotoxicity of Silicone-Based Matrices Containing BiJournal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated antibacterial effects of Ginger and Marjoram extract compared with Routine Intracanal Irrigants on Mature Material and Methods: Sixty-six extracted human teeth, were randomly assigned to four groups 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), chloroform extract of marjoram (Origanum majorana), and oil extract of ginger (Zingiber officinale), and two positive and negative control groups (n=11). Samples were contaminated with Results: No bacterial growth was detected in the NaOCl, CHX, and negative control groups. However, some bacterial growth was observed in the ginger and marjoram groups. All four solutions successfully eliminated Conclusions: Chloroform extract of marjoram and oil extract of ginger were effective in eliminating 6-week-old biofilms of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.