Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152477›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2023

"The Standard Procedure" for Investigation of Oral Neutrophils in Oral Diseases.

Peter Østrup Jensen, Pernille Dukanovic Rikvold, Kristine Røn Larsen, Mette Rose Jørgensen, Camilla Kragelund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter Østrup JensenCosterton Biofilm Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-7186
Pernille Dukanovic RikvoldDepartment of Odontology, Oral Pathology & Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristine Røn LarsenDepartment of Odontology, Oral Pathology & Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette Rose JørgensenDepartment of Odontology, Oral Pathology & Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Camilla KragelundDepartment of Odontology, Oral Pathology & Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-4972
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: There is need of an objective "standard procedure" that is reliable and clinically applicable for estimating oral neutrophil content in relation to oral diseases. Methods: Forty-one patients with suspected oral candidosis (OC) and nine healthy controls with no oral mucosal disease were flushing with 10 ml mouth rinse (MR) (sterile phosphate-buffered saline) for 1 min. Aliquots were stored on different conditions to explore stability, storage, and fixation conditions for analysis by flow cytometry. Results: The optimal storage and fixation condition for MR was by fixation 1 : 1 in 10% formalin and stored at 5°C. This procedure yielded stable results up to 7 days after collection. The ability of the optimized method to relate oral neutrophils to inflammation was demonstrated by the significantly higher number of neutrophils in patients with primary OC ( Conclusion: This method is rapid, reliable, and clinically applicable for establishing the content of oral neutrophils. We demonstrate increased density of oral neutrophils in the MR of patients with OC. The potential of the method is to be "the standard procedure" for investigation of the oral inflammation in patients with oral diseases as it is noninvasive and provides high stability, clinical relevance, and minimal handling.

Identifiers

PMID37152477
PMCPMC10159737
OpenAlexW4367300487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.