ReviewJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Effect of platelet concentrates on the treatment outcome of peri implantitis: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Tissue Changes Observed with Single-Unit Dental Implants Placed in Conjunction with Platelet-Rich Fibrin: An Evaluative Study.Journal of microscopy and ultrastructureArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet concentrates (PCs) are biological agents known to promote soft as well as hard tissue healing. The review aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of PCs for treating peri-implantitis (PI). Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed followed by a handsearch of relevant journals. The selected studies focused on the predetermined primary and secondary outcomes. The primary outcomes were bleeding on probing, probing depth, marginal bone level. RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for risk bias analysis. The search retrieved 12 articles, and only one study compared PC and open flap debridement. Other three studies with different control arms were included to evaluate the overall effect of different PCs in treatment of PI. High heterogeneity was found regarding study design, sample size, surgical techniques, and methods for preparing PCs. The use of platelet-rich fibrin for PI over conventional therapy was beneficial in improving clinical parameters. In addition, PC when combined with graft materials provided a significant improvement in parameters assessed. The preliminary data regarding the use of different PC in treatment of PI seem to be promising. However, due to lack of comparative randomized controlled trials, future clinical research is necessary to comment on the role of PCs for treating PI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.