ArticleNeurology. Genetics2023
CircPDS5B Reduction Improves Angiogenesis Following Ischemic Stroke by Regulating MicroRNA-223-3p/NOTCH2 Axis.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Epigenetics in Ischemic Stroke: From Mechanisms to Therapeutics.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- Advances in genetics and multi-omics for ischemic stroke: from pathogenesis to clinical translation.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Microglia-Derived Exosomal miR-223-3p Targets the RhoB-NF-κB-CCL11 Axis in Astrocytes and Relieves Neuronal Damage in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurochemical research · 2025Article
- Common and distinct circulating microRNAs in four neurovascular disorders.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- CircRNA and Stroke: New Insight of Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.Neurochemical research · 2024Review
- The Role of microRNAs in Epigenetic Regulation of Signaling Pathways in Neurological Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Ischemic stroke (IS) is responsible for major causes of global death and disability, for which promoting angiogenesis is a promising therapeutic strategy. This study analyzed circular RNA PDS5B (circPDS5B) and its related mechanisms in angiogenesis in IS. Methods: In the permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) mouse model, circPDS5B, microRNA (miR)-223-3p, and NOTCH2 levels were checked. By testing neurologic function, neuronal apoptosis, and expression of angiogenesis-related proteins in pMCAO mice, the protective effects of circPDS5B knockdown were probed. In human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) under oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) conditions, the effects of circPDS5B, miR-223-3p, and NOTCH2 on angiogenesis were studied by measuring cellular activities. Results: The increase of circPDS5B and NOTCH2 expression and the decrease of miR-223-3p expression were examined in pMCAO mice. Reducing circPDS5B expression indicated protection against neurologic dysfunction, apoptosis, and angiogenesis impairment. For circPDS5B-depleted or miR-223-3p-restored HBMECs under OGD treatment, angiogenesis was promoted. MiR-223-3p inhibition-associated reduction of angiogenesis could be counteracted by knocking down NOTCH2. CircPDS5B depletion-induced angiogenesis in OGD-conditioned HBMECs was repressed after overexpressing NOTCH2. Discussion: In IS, the expression of circPDS5B was upregulated, and miR-223-3p inhibited HBMECs activity and promoted NOTCH2 expression, thus promoting IS. CircPDS5B reduction improves angiogenesis following ischemic stroke by regulating microRNA-223-3p/NOTCH2 axis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.