Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152407›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2022

Validating a novel deterministic privacy-preserving record linkage between administrative & clinical data: applications in stroke research.

Alisia Southwell, Susan Bronskill, Tom Gee, Brendan Behan, Susan Gilbert Evans, Tom Mikkelsen, Elizabeth Theriault, Kirk Nylen, Shannon Lefaivre, Nelson Chong and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alisia SouthwellDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, TorontoToronto, M4N 3M5.
Susan BronskillICES, Toronto, G1 06, 2075 Bayview AvenueToronto, ON M4N 3M5.
Tom GeeIndoc Research, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Brendan BehanOntario Brain Institute, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Susan Gilbert EvansIndoc Research, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Tom MikkelsenOntario Brain Institute, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Elizabeth TheriaultOntario Brain Institute, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Kirk NylenOntario Brain Institute, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Shannon LefaivreOntario Brain Institute, Toronto, M5H 3W4.
Nelson ChongICES, Toronto, G1 06, 2075 Bayview AvenueToronto, ON M4N 3M5.
Mahmoud AzimaeeICES, Toronto, G1 06, 2075 Bayview AvenueToronto, ON M4N 3M5.
Natasa TusevljakICES, Toronto, G1 06, 2075 Bayview AvenueToronto, ON M4N 3M5.
Doug LeeICES, Toronto, G1 06, 2075 Bayview AvenueToronto, ON M4N 3M5.
Richard H SwartzDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, TorontoToronto, M4N 3M5.

Funding

CIHR 137038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research data combined with administrative data provides a robust resource capable of answering unique research questions. However, in cases where personal health data are encrypted, due to ethics requirements or institutional restrictions, traditional methods of deterministic and probabilistic record linkages are not feasible. Instead, privacy-preserving record linkages must be used to protect patients' personal data during data linkage. Objectives: To determine the feasibility and validity of a deterministic privacy preserving data linkage protocol using homomorphically encrypted data. Methods: Feasibility was measured by the number of records that successfully matched via direct identifiers. Validity was measured by the number of records that matched with multiple indirect identifiers. The threshold for feasibility and validity were both set at 95%. The datasets shared a single, direct identifier (health card number) and multiple indirect identifiers (sex and date of birth). Direct identifiers were encrypted in both datasets and then transferred to a third-party server capable of linking the encrypted identifiers without decrypting individual records. Once linked, the study team used indirect identifiers to verify the accuracy of the linkage in the final dataset. Results: With a combination of manual and automated data transfer in a sample of 8,128 individuals, the privacy-preserving data linkage took 36 days to match to a population sample of over 3.2 million records. 99.9% of the records were successfully matched with direct identifiers, and 99.8% successfully matched with multiple indirect identifiers. We deemed the linkage both feasible and valid. Conclusions: As combining administrative and research data becomes increasingly common, it is imperative to understand options for linking data when direct linkage is not feasible. The current linkage process ensured the privacy and security of patient data and improved data quality. While the initial implementations required significant computational and human resources, increased automation keeps the requirements within feasible bounds.

Indexed as

PrivacyStrokeData AccuracyHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Record Linkagedata linkagefeasibilitypersonal health informationprivacystroke

Identifiers

PMID37152407
PMCPMC10161965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.