Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152406›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2022

Representativeness of survey participants in relation to mental disorders: a linkage between national registers and a population-representative survey.

Natalie C Momen, Mathias Lasgaard, Nanna Weye, Jordan Edwards, John J McGrath, Oleguer Plana-Ripoll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Natalie C MomenNational Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Mathias LasgaardDEFACTUM - Public Health and Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nanna WeyeNational Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Jordan EdwardsOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
John J McGrathNational Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Oleguer Plana-RipollNational Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKCentral Denmark Region · DKMcMaster University · CANorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surveys and registers have provided important insights into the mental health of the community. However, both sources have strengths and limitations. While participation in surveys has been shown to be lower among those with mental disorders, misclassification and limited information on confounders are typical issues for registers. Objectives: To examine if participants of the Central Denmark Region's 2017 Methods: By linking data from the Central Denmark Region's 2017 Results: Based on register data, 10.4% (n = 110,492) of the eligible population had received a diagnosis of any mental disorder prior to the date of this survey. Among the unweighted survey sample, 8.2% (n = 2,648) had received a diagnosis; once non-response weights were applied, this corresponded to 9.5%. Representativeness varied by sex, age and type of mental disorder. For example, people with organic disorders or substance use disorders were generally underrepresented among survey participants of all ages; however, representativeness of common disorders such as mood or neurotic disorders was generally good. With respect to the association of any mental disorder and general medical conditions, we found that estimates were similar for survey samples (both weighted and unweighted) compared to the entire eligible population. Conclusions: People with a previous diagnosis of a mental disorder are slightly underrepresented in the survey. However, this selection bias was minimized when non-response weights were applied. Associations between mental disorders and general medical conditions did not appear to be affected by selection bias. With the application of non-response weights, the survey provided a sample representative of the general population in terms of mental disorder diagnoses.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotic DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersDenmarkHumansNeurotic DisordersSurveys and Questionnairesepidemiologymental disordersregister-based researchsurvey-based research

Identifiers

PMID37152406
PMCPMC10161967
OpenAlexW4306789942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.