ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
JAK inhibitors in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current treatment in macrophage activation syndrome worldwide: a systematic literature review to inform the METAPHOR project.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- EULAR/PReS recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Still's disease, comprising systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still's disease.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Guideline
- Distinct cytokine and chemokine alterations in bronchoalveolar fluid from patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated lung disease (SJIA-LD).Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- Case Report: Ruxolitinib for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis complicated by macrophage activation syndrome: two pediatric cases and literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Advancing multidisciplinary management of pediatric hyperinflammatory disorders.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Tofacitinib as an adjuvant treatment for pediatric Still's disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Tofacitinib treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Recent advances and evolving concepts in Still's disease.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Review
- Canakinumab in the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective single center study in China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Heterogeneity of macrophage activation syndrome and treatment progression.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: The Great Ormond Street Hospital experience (2005-2021).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) is characterized by excessive and inappropriate production of proinflammatory cytokines. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) can block the downstream pathway of many cytokines. The use of JAKi in SJIA or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) has only been described in a limited number of case reports. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and potential adverse effects of JAKi in SJIA patients. Methods: Patients with SJIA who received JAKi and underwent at least one assessment of efficacy and safety after JAKi initiation were eligible for this study. Data were collected retrospectively from inpatient or outpatient medical records at JAKi initiation, at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, after disease flare, after JAKi discontinuation, or at the last follow-up. Results: Ten patients with SJIA were included in the study. At the start of JAKi treatment, all patients presented with active disease; five showed variable adverse effects secondary to glucocorticoids. Seven patients received tofacitinib (one later switched to ruxolitinib). Of these, only two patients showed a complete response of persistent arthritis associated with tocilizumab; tofacitinib was used without a biological DMARD only in two patients, together with MTX, showing a partial response; three patients were nonresponders. Four patients with SJIA-related MAS or persistent hyperferritinemia were treated with ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib allowed a good response on MAS parameters in three of them. All these four patients required an adjunction or switch to canakinumab later. The median decrease in the daily glucocorticoid dose between JAKi initiation and the last follow-up was 90.6% in patients with complete remission and 77.4% in other patients. Three patients discontinued glucocorticoid treatment after the introduction of JAKi. Severe adverse events, notably serious infection or thrombosis, were not observed during JAKi treatment. Conclusion: JAKi may be an alternative or adjuvant agent for SJIA patients, especially in those with persistently active disease, glucocorticoid-related adverse reactions, or SJIA-MAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.