ReviewChemical science2023
Light-induced homolysis of copper(ii)-complexes - a perspective for photocatalysis.
Review in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking Distinct Excited States of a Nickel(II) Complex Without Modulating the Primary Coordination Sphere.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Shedding Light on Synthetic Autocatalysis: From Conventional Closed-Shell Chemistries to Overlooked Open-Shell Occurrences.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Photooxidative Copper(II) Catalysis for Promoting anti-Markovnikov Hydration of Alkenes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Leveraging Divergent Ligand-to-Metal Charge-Transfer Excited State Pathways for Catalyst Control over Alkoxyl Radical Reactivity.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Photoexcited LMCT of CuNature communications · 2025Article
- Mixed-Metal Ce-Zr-Mn Clusters as Photo-Catalysts for Decarboxylative Functionalization of Carboxylic Acids.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Molecular Design Principles for Photoactive Transition Metal Complexes: A Guide for "Photo-Motivated" Chemists.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Review
- Article
- Visible Light-Driven Excited-State Copper-BINAP Catalysis for Accessing Diverse Chemical Reactions.Chem catalysis · 2024Article
- Challenges and Future Perspectives in Photocatalysis: Conclusions from an Interdisciplinary Workshop.JACS Au · 2024Review
- Article
- Light-Induced Reactivity Switch at OJACS Au · 2024Article
- A new era of LMCT: leveraging ligand-to-metal charge transfer excited states for photochemical reactions.Chemical science · 2024Review
- Cu(II) salts as terminal oxidants in visible-light photochemical oxidation reactions.Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, photocatalysis has developed into a powerful strategy for the selective functionalization of molecules through radical intermediates. Besides the well-established iridium- or ruthenium-based photocatalysts, which ideally fulfill the requirements for a photocatalyst, such as long excited-state lifetimes and photostability, the shift towards earth-abundant metal-based photocatalysts has so far been less explored. The concept of light-induced homolysis (LIH) for generating radicals has recently gained significant interest as a new platform for inducing photoreactions with earth-abundant 3d-metal complexes despite only having excited-state lifetimes in the low nanosecond range or even below. Cu(ii)-complexes play a prominent role in exploiting this concept, which will be discussed by showcasing recent developments in organic synthesis with a view to identifying the future prospects of this growing field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.