ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Full-thickness chest wall resection for malignant chest wall tumors and postoperative problems.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A practical strategy for skeletal chest wall reconstruction after resection of malignant chest wall lesions: a single-institution experience.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Maintaining lung volume in a chest wall deformity after chest wall reconstruction.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Full-Thickness Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction for Locally Invasive Phyllodes Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Chest Wall Reconstruction Using a Titanium Mesh Plate and an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Sheet: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Complications of chest wall around malignant tumors: differences based on reconstruction strategy.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Extended radical resection and chest wall reconstruction for a pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Impact of pleural reconstruction on postoperative outcomes in rib tumor resection: a decade-long retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Pedicled flap transfer after chest wall malignant tumor resection and potential risk of postoperative respiratory problems for patients with low FEV1.0.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Sternum Metastases: From Case-Identifying Strategy to Multidisciplinary Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chest wall malignant tumor (including primary and metastatic lesions) is rare, representing less than 5% of all thoracic malignancies. Local control of chest wall malignancies requires wide resection with tumor-free margins. These requirements increase the risk of thoracic cavity failure and subsequent pulmonary failure. The restoration strategy for chest wall defects comprises chest wall reconstruction and soft-tissue coverage. Various reconstruction methods have been used, but both evidence and guidelines for chest wall reconstruction remain lacking. The purposes of this study were to collate our institutional experience, evaluate the outcomes of full-thickness chest wall resection and reconstruction for patients with chest wall malignant tumor, and identify problems in current practice for chest wall reconstruction with a focus on local control, complications, pulmonary function and scoliosis. Methods: Participants comprised 30 patients with full-thickness chest wall malignant tumor who underwent chest wall resection and reconstruction between 1997 and 2021 in Mie University Hospital. All patients underwent chest wall resection of primary, recurrent or metastatic malignant tumors. A retrospective review was conducted for 32 operations. Results: Recurrence was observed after 5 operations. Total 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 79.3%. Diameter ≥5 cm was significantly associated with poor RFS. The postoperative complication rate was 18.8%. Flail chest was observed with resection of ≥3 ribs in anterior and lateral resections or with sternum resection without polyethylene methylmethacrylate reconstruction. Postoperative EFV1.0% did not show any significant decrease. Postoperative %VC decreased significantly with resection of ≥4 ribs or an area of >70 cm2. Postoperative scoliosis was observed in 8 of 28 patients. Posterior resection was associated with a high prevalence of scoliosis (88.9%). Conclusion: With chest wall reconstruction, risks of pulmonary impairment, flail chest and scoliosis were significantly increased. New strategies including indications for rigid reconstruction are needed to improve the outcomes of chest wall reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.