ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
A modified method for CT radiomics region-of-interest segmentation in adrenal lipid-poor adenomas: a two-institution comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-class segmentation model of deep learning on contrast-enhanced computed tomography to segment and differentiate lipid-poor adrenal nodules: a dual-center study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a model predicting adrenal lipid-poor adenoma based on the minimum attenuation value from non-contrast CT: a dual-center retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the application of modified region-of-interest (ROI) segmentation method in unenhanced computed tomography in the radiomics model of adrenal lipid-poor adenoma, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance using an external medical institution data set and select the best ROI segmentation method. Methods: The imaging data of 135 lipid-poor adenomas and 102 non-adenomas in medical institution A and 30 lipid-poor adenomas and 43 non-adenomas in medical institution B were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases were pathologically or clinically confirmed. The data of Institution A builds the model, and the data of Institution B verifies the diagnostic performance of the model. Semi-automated ROI segmentation of tumors was performed using uAI software, using maximum area single-slice method (MAX) and full-volume method (ALL), as well as modified single-slice method (MAX_E) and full-volume method (ALL_E) to segment tumors, respectively. The inter-rater correlation coefficients (ICC) was performed to assess the stability of the radiomics features of the four ROI segmentation methods. The area under the curve (AUC) and at least 95% specificity pAUC (Partial AUC) were used as measures of the diagnostic performance of the model. Results: A total of 104 unfiltered radiomics features were extracted using each of the four segmentation methods. In the ROC analysis of the radiomics model, the AUC value of the model constructed by MAX was 0.925, 0.919, and 0.898 on the training set, the internal validation set, and the external validation set, respectively, and the AUC value of MAX_E was 0.937, 0.931, and 0.906, respectively. The AUC value of ALL was 0.929, 0.929, and 0.918, and the AUC value of ALL_E was 0.942, 0.926, and 0.927, respectively. In all samples, the pAUCs of MAX, MAX_E, ALL, and ALL_E were 0.021, 0.025, 0.018, and 0.028, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of the radiomics model constructed based on the full-volume method was better than that of the model based on the single-slice method. The model constructed using the ALL_E method had a stronger generalization ability and the highest AUC and pAUC value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.