Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152019›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy.

Weidong Zhang, Dong Cui, Kefeng Shi, Maolin Chen, Binbin Zhang, Rulin Qian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weidong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Dong CuiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Kefeng ShiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Maolin ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Binbin ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Rulin QianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Henan Provincial Chest Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: At present, minimally invasive radical esophagectomy is the main surgical method for esophageal cancer treatment, but it has inherent limitations. We have developed a novel method of radical esophagectomy without thoracotomy to improve this situation, namely, by using EMLE. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy (EMLE) through a retrospective analysis. Methods: From January 2019 to June 2022, we successfully performed 106 cases of radical resection of esophageal cancer with this new surgical technique, gradually improved the surgical path, and recorded the perioperative data and postoperative complications of all patients. Results: The operation was successfully performed in all patients except for two patients who required a switch to open surgery. The mean operation time was 171.11 ± 33.29 min and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 93.53 ± 56.32 ml. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 23.59 ± 5.42. The postoperative complications included pneumonia (3.77%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (1.89%), anastomotic leak (14.15%), pleural effusion (5.66%), chylothorax (2.83%), and reoperation (4.72%). All complications were graded I-III per the Clavien-Dindo classification. No perioperative death was recorded. Conclusion: Expandable mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy is feasible for radical resection of esophageal cancer, with good therapeutic effect and safety. Because of its minimal impact on patients and convenient operation, it is a novel surgical option for patients with esophageal cancer and is expected to become a standard surgical method for radical esophagectomy in the future.

Indexed as

esophageal cancerexpandable mediastinoscopefeasibilityradical esophagectomysafety

Identifiers

PMID37152019
PMCPMC10154627
OpenAlexW4366427784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.