Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151985›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control2022

Synthesizing network dynamics for short-term memory of impulsive inputs.

BethAnna Jones, ShiNung Ching

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Hamiltonian energy in a modified Hindmarsh-Rose model.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

BethAnna JonesDepartment of Electrical & Systems Engineering, Washington Univeristy in St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
ShiNung ChingFaculty of Electrical & Systems Engineering, Washington Univeristy in St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

Funding

Efficient resource allocation and information retention in working memory circuitsR01EB028154 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHING, SHINUNG, SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 2019 to 2019
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illuminating the mechanisms that the brain uses to manage and coordinate its resources is a core question in neuroscience. In particular, circuits and networks in the brain are able to encode, store and recall large amounts of information, in the service of a wide range of functionality. How do the various dynamical mechanisms within these networks allow for such coordination? We consider the specific problem of how the dynamics of networks can enact a representation of input stimuli that is retained over time, i.e., a form of short-term memory. We utilize modeling and control-theoretic methods to approach these questions, treating the state trajectory of a dynamical system as an abstract memory trace of prior inputs. The inputs impinge on the network via a variable gain, which is to be synthesized by optimization. In order to perpetuate these memory traces of stimuli, we propose that this gain is adapted to optimize: i) the error between a ground truth representation of stimuli and the encoding of them; as well as ii) overwriting of prior information. Optimizing over these central tenets of memory, we obtain a 'policy' for adapting the input gain that is dependent on the state of the network. This derived policy yields a recurrent neural network between the policy and the neural circuits, affirming existing theories that the prefrontal cortex may hold subnetworks dedicated to working memory while actively engaging with other neural subnetworks.

Identifiers

PMID37151985
PMCPMC10162585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.