Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151944›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2023

The trap of genetic tag: The importance of pathogenicity prediction tools in the correct interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in the era of high-throughput genome sequencing.

Francesco Pellegrino

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco PellegrinoDepartment of Pediatrics, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University of Torino Turin Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-8324
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recent advancements in DNA sequencing technologies and their widely used, the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance from these large datasets is not clear-cut. Here, we present the case of a family referred to our metabolic disease department, in which three males' individuals were affected by a suspected a genetic inherited disease, resulting from next-generation sequencing results. A correct assessment of the clinical significance of the genetic variant found in our cases, with a review of the literature, the evaluation of population database and the use of computational predictive program changed the initial suspect. Despite NGS technologies have increased diagnostic sensitivity, most of these variants remains of uncertain clinical significance. An efficient systematic approach is fundamental to determine the pathogenicity of a variant, avoiding incorrect interpretation in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

ALG13‐CDGvariants of uncertain significancevariants prediction tools

Identifiers

PMID37151944
PMCPMC10155503
OpenAlexW4367842538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.