ArticlePaediatrics & child health2023
Perceived barriers to the provision of adolescent confidential care in a tertiary care setting.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The use of adolescent standardized patients to teach psychosocial risk assessment and its impact on medical student self‑efficacy.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents are more likely to seek care and disclose sensitive health information if confidentiality is assured. Little is known regarding the provision of confidential care to adolescents in the hospital setting. We sought to understand confidentiality practices and barriers for adolescents cared for in a tertiary hospital setting. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of all Emergency Department (ED), hospitalist, and resident physicians at a tertiary paediatric hospital from May/2019 to July/2019. Participants were asked multiple choice questions regarding practices, comfort, and barriers to confidential care. Results: Response rate was 91% (n = 72/79; 26 ED, 14 hospitalists, 32 residents). Overall, 47% of respondents doubted that confidential care was being consistently provided to adolescents. Fifty-eight per cent of attendings and 31% of residents reported usually/always offering confidential care. Factors most reported to influence the provision of confidential care were chief complaint (75%), time of visit (45%), and patient age (25%). Barriers to the quantity or quality of confidential care were identified by 89%, most commonly including time constraints (21%), perceived parental resistance (26%), lack of private space (26%), and the belief that confidentiality is not necessary for all adolescent encounters (34%). Forty per cent of respondents reported breaching confidentially and discussing sensitive topics with adolescents in front of family members. Overall, only 45% felt they had received adequate training on how best to deliver confidential care, and 75% reported a desire for additional training. Conclusion: Results suggest inadequate provision of confidential care in a tertiary teaching hospital, with several potentially modifiable barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.